The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid
Open accessAbstract
Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy sharing allows the surplus energy from distributed energy resources (DERs) to trade between prosumers in a community Microgrid. P2P energy sharing is being becoming more attractive than the conventional peer-to-grid (P2G) trading. However, intensive sensing and communication infrastructures are required either for information flows in a local market or for building a central control system. Moreover, the existing pricing mechanisms for P2P energy sharing could not ensure all the P2P participants gain economic benefits. This work proposed a two-stage aggregated control to realize P2P energy sharing in community Microgrids, where only the measurement at the point of common coupling (PCC) and one-way communication are required. This method allows individual prosumers to control their DERs via a third party entity, so called energy sharing coordinator (ESC). In the first stage, a constrained non-linear programming (CNLP) optimization with a rolling horizon was used to minimize the energy costs of the community. In the second stage, a rule based control was carried out updating the control set-points according to the real-time measurement. The benefits of P2P energy sharing were assessed from the community’s as well as individual customers’ perspective. The proposed method was applied to residential community Microgrids with photovoltaic (PV) battery systems. It was revealed that P2P energy sharing is able to reduce the energy cost of the community by 30% compared to the conventional P2G energy trading. The modified supply demand ratio based pricing mechanism ensures every individual customer be better off, and can be used as a benchmark for any P2P energy sharing model. For consumers, the electricity bill is reduced by ∼12.4%, and for prosumers, the annual income is increased by ∼£57 per premises.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing microgrid energy markets
Mengelkamp, E., Gärttner, J., Rock, K., Kessler, S., Orsini, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.054 · Cited by 1,578
Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review
Luthander, R., Widén, J., Nilsson, D., & Palm, J. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.028 · Cited by 1,183
Kang, J., Yu, R., Huang, X., Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y., & Hossain, E. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2709784 · Cited by 1,139
Domestic electricity use: A high-resolution energy demand model
Richardson, I., Thomson, M., Infield, D., & Clifford, C. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.023 · Cited by 976
Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid
Zhang, C., Wu, J., Zhou, Y., Cheng, M., & Long, C. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.010 · Cited by 912
Self-citationEnergy-Sharing Model With Price-Based Demand Response for Microgrids of Peer-to-Peer Prosumers
Liu, N., Yu, X., Wang, C., Li, C., Ma, L., & Lei, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2649558 · Cited by 855
Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants
Morstyn, T., Farrell, N., Darby, S. J., & McCulloch, M. D. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0075-y · Cited by 831
Koirala, B. P., Koliou, E., Friege, J., Hakvoort, R. A., & Herder, P. M. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.080 · Cited by 792
Bilateral Contract Networks for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading
Morstyn, T., Teytelboym, A., & Mcculloch, M. D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2786668 · Cited by 543
Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework
Zhou, Y., Wu, J., & Long, C. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.089 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Cited by
Tushar, W., Yuen, C., Saha, T. K., Morstyn, T., Chapman, A. C., Alam, M. J. E., Hanif, S., & Poor, H. V. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116131 · Cited by 523
A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology
Esmat, A., de Vos, M., Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Y., Palensky, P., & Epema, D. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116123 · Cited by 420
Local flexibility markets: Literature review on concepts, models and clearing methods
Jin, X., Wu, Q., & Jia, H. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114387 · Cited by 373
Zia, M. F., Benbouzid, M., Elbouchikhi, E., Muyeen, S. M., Techato, K., & Guerrero, J. M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968402 · Cited by 355
van Leeuwen, G., AlSkaif, T., Gibescu, M., & van Sark, W. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114613 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, C., Wu, J., Zhou, Y., & Jenkins, N.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 226
- Pages
- 261-276
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2805202578
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.097
- The paper
- Long, C., Wu, J., Zhou, Y., & Jenkins, N. (2018). Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.