The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation
Open accessAbstract
Buildings are major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contributors to the climate crisis. To meet climate-change mitigation needs, one must go beyond operational energy consumption and related GHG emissions of buildings and address their full life cycle. This study investigates the global trends of GHG emissions arising across the life cycle of buildings by systematically compiling and analysing more than 650 life cycle assessment (LCA) case studies. The results, presented for different energy performance classes based on a final sample of 238 cases, show a clear reduction trend in life cycle GHG emissions due to improved operational energy performance. However, the analysis reveals an increase in relative and absolute contributions of so‐called ‘embodied’ GHG emissions, i.e., emissions arising from manufacturing and processing of building materials. While the average share of embodied GHG emissions from buildings following current energy performance regulations is approximately 20–25% of life cycle GHG emissions, this figure escalates to 45–50% for highly energy-efficient buildings and surpasses 90% in extreme cases. Furthermore, this study analyses GHG emissions at time of occurrence, highlighting the ‘carbon spike’ from building production. Relating the results to existing benchmarks for buildings’ GHG emissions in the Swiss SIA energy efficiency path shows that most cases exceed the target of 11.0 kgCO2eq/m2a. Considering global GHG reduction targets, these results emphasize the urgent need to reduce GHG emissions of buildings by optimizing both operational and embodied impacts. The analysis further confirmed a need for improving transparency and comparability of LCA studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., & Wood, E. F. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.214 · Cited by 6,777
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
(2012) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504121211205250 · Cited by 4,477
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · cited 1×
“The collection of published information and subsequent analysis of the documents were performed following the structured protocol for Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and the ‘snowball’ approach [45,46], a complementary strategy to assure relevant sources are not left out which consists of checking the reference lis…”
MethodEmerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment
Hellweg, S., & Milà i Canals, L. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248361 · Cited by 1,416
Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007 · Cited by 1,408
Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics
Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2012) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.007 · Cited by 627
Basbagill, J., Flager, F., Lepech, M., & Fischer, M. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009 · Cited by 615
Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Greenough, R., Taylor, S., Ozawa-Meida, L., & Acquaye, A. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.026 · Cited by 594
Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review
Buyle, M., Braet, J., & Audenaert, A. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001 · Cited by 558
Cited by
Biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical overview of LCA methods
Hoxha, E., Passer, A., Saade, M. R. M., Trigaux, D., Shuttleworth, A., Pittau, F., Allacker, K., & Habert, G. (2020) · Buildings and Cities · doi:10.5334/bc.46 · Cited by 291
Self-citationCarbon sequestration and storage in the built environment
Arehart, J. H., Hart, J., Pomponi, F., & D'Amico, B. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.028 · Cited by 210
Flexible and transportable robotic timber construction platform – TIM
Wagner, H. J., Alvarez, M., Kyjanek, O., Bhiri, Z., Buck, M., & Menges, A. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103400 · Cited by 127
Building materials in a circular economy: The case of wood waste as CO2-sink in bio concrete
Caldas, L. R., Saraiva, A. B., Lucena, A. F. P., Da Gloria, M. Y., Santos, A. S., & Filho, R. D. T. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105346 · Cited by 110
Embodied carbon emissions in buildings: explanations, interpretations, recommendations
Lützkendorf, T., & Balouktsi, M. (2022) · Buildings and Cities · doi:10.5334/bc.257 · Cited by 95
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Röck, M., Saade, M. R. M., Balouktsi, M., Rasmussen, F. N., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., Habert, G., Lützkendorf, T., & Passer, A.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 258
- Pages
- 114107
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989959769
- Cited by
- 1,163
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 34.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107
- The paper
- Röck, M., Saade, M. R. M., Balouktsi, M., Rasmussen, F. N., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., Habert, G., Lützkendorf, T., & Passer, A. (2020). Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.