Cited by 161Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFault Detection and Control Systems

Online Health Diagnosis of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Network

Khaleghi, Sahar, Karimi, Danial, Beheshti, S. Hamidreza, Hosen, Md. Sazzad, Behi, Hamidreza, Berecibar, Maitane, Van Mierlo, Joeri·2021·Applied Energy

Abstract

Abstract Battery health diagnostics is extremely crucial to guaranty the availability and reliability of the application in which they operate. Data-driven health diagnostics methods, particularly machine learning methods, have gained attention due to their simplicity and accuracy. However, a machine learning method is desired which can cope with the nonlinear behavior of battery cells and yet it avoids high computational complexity to work efficiently in online applications. The accuracy and robustness of machine learning methods strongly depend on the availability of a comprehensive battery degradation dataset that covers a variety of battery aging patterns. While many studies fail to address the aforementioned requirements, this study attempts to address them. Twenty-one nickel manganese cobalt oxide battery cells have been cycled in various operating conditions for more than two years to acquire the data. The partial charging voltage curve is explored to extract the health indicators that describe the health trajectory of the battery. Afterward, a nonlinear autoregressive exogenous (NARX) model is developed to capture the dependency between the health indicators and state of health of battery cells. Finally, the accuracy and robustness of the proposed method are validated. The results demonstrate the ability of NARX to health diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries with a maximum root mean squared error of 0.46 for untrained data. This indicates that the proposed model has high estimation accuracy, low computational complexity, and the ability of battery health estimation regardless of its aging pattern. These features point out the practicability of the proposed technique on online health diagnostics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning models can automatically learn and extract features from data, showing significant advantages for complex time-series data.

    “Deep learning models can automatically learn and extract features from data, showing significant advantages, especially when dealing with complex time-series data.45,46”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 161

Authors
Khaleghi, S., Karimi, D., Beheshti, S. H., Hosen, M. S., Behi, H., Berecibar, M., & Van Mierlo, J.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Khaleghi, Sahar
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
282
Pages
116159
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102566467
Cited by
161
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
NARX model, nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model, state of health estimation, battery degradation, health indicators, online health monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review