The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scalable multi-agent reinforcement learning for distributed control of residential energy flexibility
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a novel scalable type of multi-agent reinforcement learning-based coordination for distributed residential energy. Cooperating agents learn to control the flexibility offered by electric vehicles, space heating and flexible loads in a partially observable stochastic environment. In the standard independent Q-learning approach, the coordination performance of agents under partial observability drops at scale in stochastic environments. Here, the novel combination of learning from off-line convex optimisations on historical data and isolating marginal contributions to total rewards in reward signals increases stability and performance at scale. Using fixed-size Q-tables, prosumers are able to assess their marginal impact on total system objectives without sharing personal data either with each other or with a central coordinator. Case studies are used to assess the fitness of different combinations of exploration sources, reward definitions, and multi-agent learning frameworks. It is demonstrated that the proposed strategies create value at individual and system levels thanks to reductions in the costs of energy imports, losses, distribution network congestion, battery depreciation and greenhouse gas emissions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The introduction of multi-agent frameworks further enhances coordination among decentralized units by embedding decision-making capabilities directly into agents situated at different network layers [18].”
From Explainable AI and Multi-Agent Systems for Energy Management in IoT-Edge Environments: A State of the Art Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning
Vinyals, O., Babuschkin, I., Czarnecki, W. M., Mathieu, M., Dudzik, A., Chung, J., Choi, D. H., Powell, R., Ewalds, T., Georgiev, P., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z · Cited by 3,455
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Matignon, 2012, Independent reinforcement learners in cooperative Markov games: A survey regarding coordination problems, Knowl Eng Rev, 27, 1, 10.1017/S0269888912000057 · DOI
- Vázquez-Canteli, 2019, Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques, Appl Energy, 235, 1072, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Pumphrey, 2020, Green hope or red herring? Examining consumer perceptions of peer-to-peer energy trading in the United Kingdom, Energy Res Soc Sci, 68
- Chen, 2019, Indirect customer-to-customer energy trading with reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 10, 4338, 10.1109/TSG.2018.2857449 · DOI
- Bugden, 2019, A synthetic view of acceptance and engagement with smart meters in the United States, Energy Res Soc Sci, 47, 137, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.025 · DOI
- Moret, 2019, Energy collectives: A community and fairness based approach to future electricity markets, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 34, 3994, 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2808961 · DOI
- Recht, 2018, A tour of reinforcement learning: The view from continuous control, ArXiv
- Sen, 1994, Learning to coordinate without sharing information, Proc Natl Conf Artif Intell, 1, 426
- Ruelens, 2017, Residential demand response of thermostatically controlled loads using batch reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 8, 2149, 10.1109/TSG.2016.2517211 · DOI
- Morstyn, 2018, Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants, Nat Energy, 3, 94, 10.1038/s41560-017-0075-y · DOI
- Antonopoulos, 2020, Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 130
- Schellenberg, 2020, Comparison of metaheuristic optimisation methods for grid-edge technology that leverages heat pumps and thermal energy storage, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 131
- Darby, 2020, Demand response and smart technology in theory and practice: Customer experiences and system actors, Energy Policy, 143
- Lu, 2019, Incentive-based demand response for smart grid with reinforcement learning and deep neural network, Appl Energy, 236, 937, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.061 · DOI
- Kim, 2016, Dynamic pricing and energy consumption scheduling with reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 7, 2187, 10.1109/TSG.2015.2495145 · DOI
- Babar, 2018, The evaluation of agile demand response: An applied methodology, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 9, 6118, 10.1109/TSG.2017.2703643 · DOI
- Vayá MG, Roselló LB, Andersson G. Optimal bidding of plug-in electric vehicles in a market-based control setup. In: Proceedings - 2014 power systems computation conference. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038108. · DOI
- Ye, 2020, Deep reinforcement learning for strategic bidding in electricity markets, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 11, 1343, 10.1109/TSG.2019.2936142 · DOI
- Kim, 2020, Automatic P2P energy trading model based on reinforcement learning using long short-term delayed reward, Energies, 13, 10.3390/en13205359 · DOI
- Zhang, 2017, Deep transfer Q-learning with virtual leader-follower for supply–demand stackelberg game of smart grid, Energy, 133, 348, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.114 · DOI
- Hurtado, 2018, Enabling cooperative behavior for building demand response based on extended joint action learning, IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 14, 127, 10.1109/TII.2017.2753408 · DOI
- Taylor, 2014, Accelerating learning in multi-objective systems through transfer learning, Proc Int Joint Conf Neural Netw, 2298
- Guerrero, 2020, Towards a transactive energy system for integration of distributed energy resources: Home energy management, distributed optimal power flow, and peer-to-peer energy trading, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 132, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110000 · DOI
- Cao, 2019, Deep reinforcement learning based energy storage arbitrage with accurate lithium-ion battery degradation model, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 14, 1
- Crozier, 2018, Mitigating the impact of personal vehicle electrification: A power generation perspective, Energy Policy, 118, 474, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.056 · DOI
- Rozada, 2020, Load frequency control: A deep multi-agent reinforcement learning approach, IEEE Power Energy Soc General Meeting, 2020, 0
- Kraemer, 2016, Multi-agent reinforcement learning as a rehearsal for decentralized planning, Neurocomputing, 190, 82, 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.031 · DOI
- Buşoniu, 2008, A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern Part C: Appl Rev, 38, 156, 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.913919 · DOI · Paper page
- Morstyn, 2019, Multiclass energy management for peer-to-peer energy trading driven by prosumer preferences, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 34, 4005, 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2834472 · DOI
- Coffrin, 2012, Approximating line losses and apparent power in AC power flow linearizations, IEEE Power Energy Soc General Meeting, 1
- Morstyn, 2020, Integrating P2P energy trading with probabilistic distribution locational marginal pricing, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 11, 3095, 10.1109/TSG.2019.2963238 · DOI
- Dufo-López, 2014, Comparison of different lead–acid battery lifetime prediction models for use in simulation of stand-alone photovoltaic systems, Appl Energy, 115, 242, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.021 · DOI
- Wolpert, 2002, Optimal payoff functions for members of collectives, Advances in Complex Systems, 04
- Lloyd, 1982, Least squares quantization in PCM, IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 28, 129, 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown J, Chambers J, Rogers A. SMITE : Using Smart Meters to Infer the Thermal Efficiency of Residential Homes. In: The 7th ACM international conference on systems for energy- efficient buildings, cities, and transportation. 2020. · DOI
- Rashid, 2020, Weighted QMIX: Expanding monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 2020
- Becker, 2018, Estimating the savings potential of occupancy-based heating strategies, Energy Inform, 1, 10.1186/s42162-018-0022-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Álvarez-López, C., González-Briones, A., & Li, T. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15020385 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Charbonnier, F., Morstyn, T., & McCulloch, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Charbonnier, Flora
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 314
- Pages
- 118825
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220906859
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- multi-agent reinforcement learning, distributed control, electric vehicles, space heating, flexible loads, prosumers, partial observability, Q-learning, reward function design, marginal contribution, distributed energy resources, energy import costs, distribution network congestion, battery degradation, greenhouse gas emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review