Cited by 78Smart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scalable multi-agent reinforcement learning for distributed control of residential energy flexibility

Open access

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel scalable type of multi-agent reinforcement learning-based coordination for distributed residential energy. Cooperating agents learn to control the flexibility offered by electric vehicles, space heating and flexible loads in a partially observable stochastic environment. In the standard independent Q-learning approach, the coordination performance of agents under partial observability drops at scale in stochastic environments. Here, the novel combination of learning from off-line convex optimisations on historical data and isolating marginal contributions to total rewards in reward signals increases stability and performance at scale. Using fixed-size Q-tables, prosumers are able to assess their marginal impact on total system objectives without sharing personal data either with each other or with a central coordinator. Case studies are used to assess the fitness of different combinations of exploration sources, reward definitions, and multi-agent learning frameworks. It is demonstrated that the proposed strategies create value at individual and system levels thanks to reductions in the costs of energy imports, losses, distribution network congestion, battery depreciation and greenhouse gas emissions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118825

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Matignon, 2012, Independent reinforcement learners in cooperative Markov games: A survey regarding coordination problems, Knowl Eng Rev, 27, 1, 10.1017/S0269888912000057 · DOI
  2. Vázquez-Canteli, 2019, Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques, Appl Energy, 235, 1072, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Pumphrey, 2020, Green hope or red herring? Examining consumer perceptions of peer-to-peer energy trading in the United Kingdom, Energy Res Soc Sci, 68
  4. Chen, 2019, Indirect customer-to-customer energy trading with reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 10, 4338, 10.1109/TSG.2018.2857449 · DOI
  5. Bugden, 2019, A synthetic view of acceptance and engagement with smart meters in the United States, Energy Res Soc Sci, 47, 137, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.025 · DOI
  6. Moret, 2019, Energy collectives: A community and fairness based approach to future electricity markets, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 34, 3994, 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2808961 · DOI
  7. Recht, 2018, A tour of reinforcement learning: The view from continuous control, ArXiv
  8. Sen, 1994, Learning to coordinate without sharing information, Proc Natl Conf Artif Intell, 1, 426
  9. Ruelens, 2017, Residential demand response of thermostatically controlled loads using batch reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 8, 2149, 10.1109/TSG.2016.2517211 · DOI
  10. Morstyn, 2018, Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants, Nat Energy, 3, 94, 10.1038/s41560-017-0075-y · DOI
  11. Antonopoulos, 2020, Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 130
  12. Schellenberg, 2020, Comparison of metaheuristic optimisation methods for grid-edge technology that leverages heat pumps and thermal energy storage, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 131
  13. Darby, 2020, Demand response and smart technology in theory and practice: Customer experiences and system actors, Energy Policy, 143
  14. Lu, 2019, Incentive-based demand response for smart grid with reinforcement learning and deep neural network, Appl Energy, 236, 937, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.061 · DOI
  15. Kim, 2016, Dynamic pricing and energy consumption scheduling with reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 7, 2187, 10.1109/TSG.2015.2495145 · DOI
  16. Babar, 2018, The evaluation of agile demand response: An applied methodology, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 9, 6118, 10.1109/TSG.2017.2703643 · DOI
  17. Vayá MG, Roselló LB, Andersson G. Optimal bidding of plug-in electric vehicles in a market-based control setup. In: Proceedings - 2014 power systems computation conference. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038108. · DOI
  18. Ye, 2020, Deep reinforcement learning for strategic bidding in electricity markets, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 11, 1343, 10.1109/TSG.2019.2936142 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2020, Automatic P2P energy trading model based on reinforcement learning using long short-term delayed reward, Energies, 13, 10.3390/en13205359 · DOI
  20. Zhang, 2017, Deep transfer Q-learning with virtual leader-follower for supply–demand stackelberg game of smart grid, Energy, 133, 348, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.114 · DOI
  21. Hurtado, 2018, Enabling cooperative behavior for building demand response based on extended joint action learning, IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 14, 127, 10.1109/TII.2017.2753408 · DOI
  22. Taylor, 2014, Accelerating learning in multi-objective systems through transfer learning, Proc Int Joint Conf Neural Netw, 2298
  23. Guerrero, 2020, Towards a transactive energy system for integration of distributed energy resources: Home energy management, distributed optimal power flow, and peer-to-peer energy trading, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 132, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110000 · DOI
  24. Cao, 2019, Deep reinforcement learning based energy storage arbitrage with accurate lithium-ion battery degradation model, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 14, 1
  25. Crozier, 2018, Mitigating the impact of personal vehicle electrification: A power generation perspective, Energy Policy, 118, 474, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.056 · DOI
  26. Rozada, 2020, Load frequency control: A deep multi-agent reinforcement learning approach, IEEE Power Energy Soc General Meeting, 2020, 0
  27. Kraemer, 2016, Multi-agent reinforcement learning as a rehearsal for decentralized planning, Neurocomputing, 190, 82, 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.031 · DOI
  28. Buşoniu, 2008, A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern Part C: Appl Rev, 38, 156, 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.913919 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Morstyn, 2019, Multiclass energy management for peer-to-peer energy trading driven by prosumer preferences, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 34, 4005, 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2834472 · DOI
  30. Coffrin, 2012, Approximating line losses and apparent power in AC power flow linearizations, IEEE Power Energy Soc General Meeting, 1
  31. Morstyn, 2020, Integrating P2P energy trading with probabilistic distribution locational marginal pricing, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 11, 3095, 10.1109/TSG.2019.2963238 · DOI
  32. Dufo-López, 2014, Comparison of different lead–acid battery lifetime prediction models for use in simulation of stand-alone photovoltaic systems, Appl Energy, 115, 242, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.021 · DOI
  33. Wolpert, 2002, Optimal payoff functions for members of collectives, Advances in Complex Systems, 04
  34. Lloyd, 1982, Least squares quantization in PCM, IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 28, 129, 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Brown J, Chambers J, Rogers A. SMITE : Using Smart Meters to Infer the Thermal Efficiency of Residential Homes. In: The 7th ACM international conference on systems for energy- efficient buildings, cities, and transportation. 2020. · DOI
  36. Rashid, 2020, Weighted QMIX: Expanding monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 2020
  37. Becker, 2018, Estimating the savings potential of occupancy-based heating strategies, Energy Inform, 1, 10.1186/s42162-018-0022-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Charbonnier, F., Morstyn, T., & McCulloch, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Charbonnier, Flora
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
314
Pages
118825
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220906859
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
multi-agent reinforcement learning, distributed control, electric vehicles, space heating, flexible loads, prosumers, partial observability, Q-learning, reward function design, marginal contribution, distributed energy resources, energy import costs, distribution network congestion, battery degradation, greenhouse gas emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review