The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal sizing of renewable energy storage: A techno-economic analysis of hydrogen, battery and hybrid systems considering degradation and seasonal storage
Open accessAbstract
Energy storage is essential to address the intermittent issues of renewable energy systems, thereby enhancing system stability and reliability. This paper presents the design and operation optimisation of hydrogen/battery/hybrid energy storage systems considering component degradation and energy cost volatility. The study examines a real-world case study, which is a grid-connected warehouse located in a tropical climate zone with a photovoltaic solar system. An accurate and robust Multi-Objective Modified Firefly Algorithm (MOMFA) is proposed for the optimal design and operation of the energy storage systems of the case study. To further demonstrate the robustness and versatility of the optimisation method, another synthetic case is tested for a location in a temperate climate zone that has a high seasonal mismatch. The modelling results show that the system in the tropical zone always provides a superior return when compared to a similar system in the temperate zone due to abundant solar resources. When comparing battery-only and hydrogen-only systems, battery systems perform better than hydrogen systems in many situations, with a higher self-sufficient ratio and net present value. However, if there is high seasonal variation and a high requirement for using renewable energy (the penetration of renewable energy is >80 %), using hydrogen for energy storage is more beneficial. Furthermore, the hybrid system (i.e., combining battery and hydrogen) outperforms battery-only and hydrogen-only systems. This is attributed to the complementary combination of hydrogen, which can be used as a long-term energy storage option, and battery, which is utilised as a short-term option. This study also shows that storing hydrogen in a long-term strategy can lower component degradation, enhance efficiency, and increase the total economic performance of hydrogen and hybrid storage systems. The developed optimisation method and findings of this study can support the implementation of energy storage systems for renewable energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Larminie, J., & Dicks, A. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118878330 · Cited by 3,935
Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges
Yue, M., Lambert, H., Pahon, E., Roche, R., Jemei, S., & Hissel, D. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111180 · Cited by 2,323
Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse
Esen, M., & Yuksel, T. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.018 · Cited by 939
Chauhan, A., & Saini, R. P. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.079 · Cited by 792
An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling
Chowdhury, M. S., Rahman, K. S., Chowdhury, T., Nuthammachot, N., Techato, K., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Tiong, S. K., Sopian, K., & Amin, N. (2020) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100431 · Cited by 785
Classification and assessment of energy storage systems
Guney, M. S., & Tepe, Y. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.102 · Cited by 765
A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage
Blanco, H., & Faaij, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062 · Cited by 710
The design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems
Sepulveda, N. A., Jenkins, J. D., Edington, A., Mallapragada, D. S., & Lester, R. K. (2021) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00796-8 · Cited by 689
Hannan, M. A., Wali, S. B., Ker, P. J., Rahman, M. S. A., Mansor, M., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Muttaqi, K. M., Mahlia, T. M. I., & Dong, Z. Y. (2021) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.103023 · Cited by 676
Cited by
A review on recent trends, challenges, and innovations in alkaline water electrolysis
Emam, A. S., Hamdan, M. O., Abu-Nabah, B. A., & Elnajjar, E. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.238 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Le, T. S., Nguyen, T. N., Bui, D.-K., & Ngo, T. D.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 336
- Pages
- 120817
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4320719857
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal sizing of renewable energy storage: A techno-economic analysis of hydrogen, battery and hybrid systems considering degradation and seasonal storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120817
- The paper
- Le, T. S., Nguyen, T. N., Bui, D.-K., & Ngo, T. D. (2023). Optimal sizing of renewable energy storage: A techno-economic analysis of hydrogen, battery and hybrid systems considering degradation and seasonal storage. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.