Cited by 44Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyMultisensory perception and integrationInteractive and Immersive Displays

Synchronous and asynchronous presentations of auditory and visual signals: Implications for control console design

Chan, Alan H.S., Chan, Ken W.L.·2006·Applied Ergonomics

Abstract

In this study, the effects of synchronous and asynchronous auditory and visual signal presentation on reaction times and response errors were examined to provide data for developing ergonomics recommendations for control console design. The results showed that synchronous presentation for combined visual and auditory stimulation facilitated responses, and shorter reaction times and higher response accuracies were obtained. When visual and auditory stimuli were presented synchronously but in opposing (left and right) positions, a visual dominance phenomenon was found, such that the subjects responded more often (81%) with faster responses to the visual signal. This visual dominance effect occurred even in the asynchronous condition when the auditory stimulus was presented 200 ms earlier than the visual one. It was also found that response speed and accuracy improved with increasing length of the warning time interval, and when an uncrossed hand posture was used for making responses. The above results were translated into practical ergonomic recommendations for response key layout, warning time interval, and ways of presenting visual and auditory signals to improve control console design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The failure to demonstrate any benefit of bimodal over unimodal feedback in a car driving situation in several recent studies may have been due to the spatial disparity introduced between the signals presented in the various different modalities.

    “It should be noted that the failure to demonstrate any benefit of bimodal over unimodal feedback in a car driving situation that has been reported in several recent studies may have been due to the spatial disparity introduced between the signals presented in the various different modalities.”
  • All of the feedback signals presented in the present study came from the same spatial location, and this may help to explain why a beneficial effect was observed on driver performance.

    “all of the feedback signals presented in the present study came from the same spatial location, and this may help to explain why such a beneficial effect was observed on driver performance [20,34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, A. H. S., & Chan, K. W. L.
Affiliations
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Alan H.S.
Venue
Applied Ergonomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
131-140
ISSN
0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078987238
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • City University of Hong Kong
  • University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
auditory signals, visual signals, reaction time, response errors, hand posture
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Data Display, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Ergonomics, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review