Synchronous and asynchronous presentations of auditory and visual signals: Implications for control console design
Abstract
In this study, the effects of synchronous and asynchronous auditory and visual signal presentation on reaction times and response errors were examined to provide data for developing ergonomics recommendations for control console design. The results showed that synchronous presentation for combined visual and auditory stimulation facilitated responses, and shorter reaction times and higher response accuracies were obtained. When visual and auditory stimuli were presented synchronously but in opposing (left and right) positions, a visual dominance phenomenon was found, such that the subjects responded more often (81%) with faster responses to the visual signal. This visual dominance effect occurred even in the asynchronous condition when the auditory stimulus was presented 200 ms earlier than the visual one. It was also found that response speed and accuracy improved with increasing length of the warning time interval, and when an uncrossed hand posture was used for making responses. The above results were translated into practical ergonomic recommendations for response key layout, warning time interval, and ways of presenting visual and auditory signals to improve control console design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The failure to demonstrate any benefit of bimodal over unimodal feedback in a car driving situation in several recent studies may have been due to the spatial disparity introduced between the signals presented in the various different modalities.
“It should be noted that the failure to demonstrate any benefit of bimodal over unimodal feedback in a car driving situation that has been reported in several recent studies may have been due to the spatial disparity introduced between the signals presented in the various different modalities.”
From Assessing the Benefits of Multimodal Feedback on Dual-Task Performance under Demanding Conditions (2008) · cites this paper as [34]
All of the feedback signals presented in the present study came from the same spatial location, and this may help to explain why a beneficial effect was observed on driver performance.
“all of the feedback signals presented in the present study came from the same spatial location, and this may help to explain why such a beneficial effect was observed on driver performance [20,34].”
From Assessing the Benefits of Multimodal Feedback on Dual-Task Performance under Demanding Conditions (2008) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Multiple resources and performance prediction
Wickens, C. D. (2002) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220210123806 · Cited by 2,621 · see citing works
(1992) · doi:10.1201/b12577 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing the Benefits of Multimodal Feedback on Dual-Task Performance under Demanding Conditions
Lee, J.-H., & Spence, C. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2008.18 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chan, A. H. S., & Chan, K. W. L.
- Affiliations
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Alan H.S.
- ORCID
- Chan, Alan H.S.
- Venue
- Applied Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-140
- ISSN
- 0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078987238
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- City University of Hong Kong
- University of Hong Kong
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- auditory signals, visual signals, reaction time, response errors, hand posture
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Data Display, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Ergonomics, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, User-Computer Interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review