Cited by 43Thermoregulation and physiological responsesOccupational Health and Safety ResearchOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Effects of heat stress on risk perceptions and risk taking

Chang, Chu-Hsiang, Bernard, Thomas E., Logan, Jennifer·2017·Applied Ergonomics

Abstract

Exposure to extreme heat at work is a serious occupational hazard, as exposure can result in heat-related illnesses, and it has been linked to increased risk of accidents and injuries. The current study aimed to examine whether heat exposure is related to changes in individuals' psychological process of risk evaluation, and whether acclimatization can mitigate the effect of heat exposure. A study with quasi-experiment research design was used to compare participants' risk perceptions and risk-taking behaviors at baseline, initial exposure to heat, and exposure after acclimatization across male participants who were exposed to heat (N = 6), and males (N = 5) and females (N = 6) who were in the control group who were exposed to ambient temperature. Results show that participants perceived the same risky behaviors to be less risky (p = 0.003) and demonstrated increased risk-taking behaviors (p = 0.001) after initial heat exposure. While their risk perceptions returned to baseline level after acclimatization, their risk-taking behaviors remained heightened (p = 0.031). Participants who were not exposed to heat showed no significant fluctuation in their risk perceptions and risk-taking. Our findings support that risk-related processes may explain the effects of heat exposure on increased accidents and injuries beyond its direct impact on heat-related illnesses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, C.-H., Bernard, T. E., & Logan, J.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Chu-Hsiang
Venue
Applied Ergonomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
62
Pages
150-157
ISSN
0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604242268
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (T42 OH 008438)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
heat stress, occupational heat exposure, risk perception, risk-taking, risk assessment, acclimatization, occupational hazards, gender differences
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adult, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Perception, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk-Taking, Risk Assessment, Heat Stress Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review