Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13Fluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A coupled discrete droplet and SPH model for predicting spray impingement onto surfaces and into fluid pools

Open access
Cleary, Paul W., Serizawa, Yoshihiro·2019·Applied Mathematical Modelling

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we detail the development of a combined DEM-SPH model for spray impingement into a pool of water or onto a flat surface on which a pool of water can build up. The spray is represented by discrete particles which can collide with solid objects, each other and also merge with liquid surfaces. The liquid pool dynamics are solved for using the SPH method. The proposed coupling allows momentum to be transferred from the discrete spray phase into the fluid phase in the pool. The performance of this coupled DEM-SPH method is evaluated by comparing to experiments performed for simple spray arrangements in which the pressure in the pool just above the solid surface is carefully measured by a probe that is moved systematically across the surface. A comparison of the simulated pressure distribution with those from the experiments shows very good agreement for the size of the high pressure region, the average pressure the pressure distribution within this region generated by the spray impingement for cases with one, two and three overlapping sprays. Collisions between spray droplets in the case of multiple sprays are found to have a small but noticeable effect on the details of the high pressures in the regions of overlap of the sprays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apm.2018.12.024

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cleary, 2009, Industrial particle flow modelling using DEM, Eng. Compos., 26, 698
  2. Hewitt, 1998, Boiling, Chapter 15 in: Handbook of Heat Transfer

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cleary, P. W., & Serizawa, Y.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Nippon Steel (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Cleary, Paul W.
Venue
Applied Mathematical Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
69
Pages
301-329
ISSN
0307-904X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907677324
Cited by
13
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Mathematical Modelling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
spray impingement, discrete element method, smoothed particle hydrodynamics, droplet collision, droplet coalescence, surface pressure distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.