Cited by 58Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersMotor Control and AdaptationChildren's Physical and Motor Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Novel Instrument for Quantifying Grip Activity During Handwriting

Chau, Tom, Ji, Jingping, Tam, Cynthia, Schwellnus, Heidi·2006·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To describe and exemplify a noninvasive instrumentation system that uniquely records grip forces exerted on the barrel of the writing utensil along with typical temporal and kinematic parameters. Design Exploratory case series. Setting A tertiary care, pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Participants Convenience sample of 6 primary school children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) with documented fine motor difficulties and 6 children with no known handwriting difficulties. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Grip and normal forces during handwriting. Results The instrumentation revealed nontrivial correlations between normal and grip forces (0.55 +/- 0.16), a temporal delay between normal and grip forces (97.7 +/- 16 ms), and a consistent grip-to-normal force ratio (4.3 +/- 1.5), across all participants. Grip force distributions agreed intuitively with qualitative observations of individual grasps of the writing utensil. Further, 5 new parameters derived from grip force measures statistically differentiated between able-bodied children and those with hemiplegic CP. Conclusions The proposed instrumentation provides new insight into grip and normal force coordination and has the potential to uncover discriminatory grip force characteristics between writers with and without handwriting difficulties. Further study with larger populations is required to define functional ranges for the new grip measures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.328

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research demonstrates that 90-98% of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, cerebral palsy, and autism spectrum disorder struggle with writing.

    “Research demonstrates that 90–98% of children with these disorders struggle with writing (29-32).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Rosenblum, 2003, Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties, Educ Psychol Rev, 15, 41, 10.1023/A:1021371425220 · DOI
  2. Sheffield, 1996, Handwriting: a neglected cornerstone of literacy, Ann Dyslexia, 46, 21, 10.1007/BF02648169 · DOI
  3. Weil, 1993, Biomechanical aspects of handwriting in the educational setting: annotated bibliography, Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 13, 57, 10.1080/J006v13n02_04 · DOI
  4. Tseng, 2000, Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed, Am J Occup Ther, 54, 83, 10.5014/ajot.54.1.83 · DOI
  5. Ziviani, 1998, Writing speed and legibility of 7–14-year-old school students using modern cursive script, Aust Occup Ther J, 45, 59, 10.1111/j.1440-1630.1998.tb00783.x · DOI
  6. Rubin, 1982, Two sides of the same coin: variations in teaching methods and failure to learn to write, Spec Educ Forward Trends, 9, 17
  7. Smits-Engelsman, 2001, Fine motor deficiencies in children diagnosed as DCD based on poor grapho-motor ability, Hum Mov Sci, 20, 161, 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00033-1 · DOI
  8. Feder, 2003, Children’s handwriting evaluation tools and their psychometric properties, Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 23, 65, 10.1080/J006v23n03_05 · DOI
  9. Wallen, 1997, Interrater reliability of the handwriting speed test, Occup Ther J Res, 17, 280, 10.1177/153944929701700404 · DOI
  10. Rosenblum, 2006, Relationships among biomechanical ergonomic factors, handwriting product quality, handwriting efficiency, and computerized handwriting process measures in children with and without handwriting difficulties, Am J Occup Ther, 60, 28, 10.5014/ajot.60.1.28 · DOI
  11. Longstaff, 1999, A nonlinear analysis of the temporal characteristics of handwriting, Hum Mov Sci, 18, 485, 10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00028-7 · DOI
  12. Athenes, 2004, Evaluating the coordination dynamics of handwriting, Hum Mov Sci, 23, 621, 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.004 · DOI
  13. Rosenblum, 2003, Computerized temporal handwriting characteristics of proficient and non-proficient handwriters, Am J Occup Ther, 57, 129, 10.5014/ajot.57.2.129 · DOI
  14. Lochy, 2004, Specific order impairment in Arabic number writing: a case study, Cogn Neuropsychol, 21, 555, 10.1080/02643290342000618 · DOI
  15. Longstaff, 1997, Space-time invariance in adult handwriting, Acta Psychol, 97, 201, 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00015-2 · DOI
  16. Smits-Engelsman, 1997, Dysgraphia in children: lasting psychomotor deficiency or transient developmental delay?, J Exp Child Psychol, 67, 164, 10.1006/jecp.1997.2400 · DOI
  17. Herrick, 1961, Pressure on point and barrel of a writing instrument, J Exp Educ, 30, 215, 10.1080/00220973.1961.11010709 · DOI
  18. Baron, 1989, Acceleration measurement with an instrumented pen for signature verification and handwriting analysis, IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 38, 1132, 10.1109/19.46414 · DOI
  19. Wu, 2004, A novel force sensitive tablet for handwriting information acquisition, 654, 10.1007/978-3-540-30548-4_75 · DOI
  20. Read, 2005, Recognition errors and recognizing errors—children writing on the Tablet PC, Lect Notes Comput Sci, 3583, 1096, 10.1007/11555261_113 · DOI
  21. van den Heuvel, 1998, Axial pen force increases with processing demands in handwriting, Acta Psychol, 100, 145, 10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00031-6 · DOI
  22. Wann, 1991, The control of pen pressure in handwriting: a subtle point, Hum Mov Sci, 5, 275, 10.1016/0167-9457(86)90032-1 · DOI
  23. Chakarov, 2006, Handwriting performance in the absence of visual control in writer’s cramp patients: initial observations, BMC Neurol, 6, 14, 10.1186/1471-2377-6-14 · DOI
  24. Schenk, 2001, Is writer’s cramp caused by a deficit of sensorimotor integration?, Exp Brain Res, 136, 321, 10.1007/s002210000599 · DOI
  25. Odergren, 1996, Impaired sensory-motor integration during grasping in writer’s cramp, Brain, 119, 569, 10.1093/brain/119.2.569 · DOI
  26. DeMatteo, 1993, The reliability and validity of Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 13, 1, 10.1080/J006v13n02_01 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chau, T., Ji, J., Tam, C., & Schwellnus, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Bloorview Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Chau, Tom
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
87
Issue
11
Pages
1542-1547
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038045050
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Chemistry
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
grip force, handwriting, spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, normal force, children, handwriting assessment
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Cerebral Palsy, Computers, Disability Evaluation, Hand, Handwriting, Hemiplegia, Humans, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review