Is stair climb power a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments in at-risk older adults?
Abstract
Objective To test the clinical relevance of the stair climb power test (SCPT) as a measure of leg power impairments in mobility-limited older adults.Design Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from participants within a randomized controlled trial.Setting Rehabilitation research gym.Participants Community-dwelling older adults (N=138; mean age, 75.4 y) with mobility limitations as defined by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).Interventions Not applicable.Main outcome measures Leg power measures included the SCPT and double leg press power measured at 40% (DLP40) and 70% (DLP70) of the 1 repetition maximum. Mobility performance tests included the SPPB and its 3 components: gait speed, chair stand time, and standing balance.Results Stair climb power per kilogram (SCP/kg) had correlations of moderate strength (r=.47, r=.52) with DLP40/kg and DLP70/kg, respectively. All 3 leg power measures correlated with each of the mobility performance measures with the exception of DLP40/kg (r=.11, P=.27) and DLP70/kg (r=.11, P=.18) with standing balance. Magnitudes of association, as described by the Pearson correlation coefficient, did not differ substantively among the separate power measures as they related to SPPB performance overall. Separate adjusted multivariate models evaluating the relationship between leg power and SPPB performance were all statistically significant and described equivalent amounts of the total variance (R(2)) in SPPB performance (SCP/kg, R(2)=.30; DLP40, R(2)=.32; DLP70, R(2)=.31). Analyses of the components of the SPPB show that the SCPT had stronger associations than the other leg power impairment measures with models predicting chair stand (SCP/kg, R(2)=.25; DLP40, R(2)=.12; DLP70, R(2)=.13), whereas both types of leg press power testing had stronger associations with models predicting gait speed (SCP/kg, R(2)=.16; DLP40, R(2)=.34; DLP70, R(2)=.34). Stair climb power was the only power measure that was a significant component of models predicting standing balance (SCP/kg R(2)=.20).Conclusions The SCPT is a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments. It is associated with more complex modes of testing leg power impairments and is meaningfully associated with mobility performance, making it suitable for clinical settings in which impairment-mobility relationships are of interest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several reports suggest that muscle power is more highly correlated with physical function than strength or muscle mass.
“and several reports suggest that muscle power is more highly correlated with physical function than strength or muscle mass.12,13,14”
From Comparison of Power Training vs Traditional Strength Training on Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 278
- Authors
- Bean, J. F., Kiely, D. K., LaRose, S., Alian, J., & Frontera, W. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
- University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus (PR)
- Corresponding author
- Bean, Jonathan F.
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 604-609
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030594499
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 24.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K23AG019663)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- leg power, Short Physical Performance Battery, walking speed, chair stand, standing balance, vulnerable elderly, community-dwelling older adults, mobility impairment, rehabilitation outcome measures, strength testing, balance testing, specific power, one-repetition maximum
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Exercise Test, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Task Performance and Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Muscle, Skeletal, Lower Extremity, Mobility Limitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review