Cited by 69Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

The impact of female reproductive function on outcomes after traumatic brain injury

Ripley, David L., Harrison-Felix, Cindy, Sendroy-Terrill, Melissa, Cusick, Christopher P., Dannels-McClure, Amy, Morey, Clare·2008·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objectives To determine the impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on female menstrual and reproductive functioning and to examine the relationships between severity of injury, duration of amenorrhea, and TBI outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort survey. Setting Telephone interview. Participants Women (N=30; age range, 18-45y), between 1 and 3 years postinjury, who had completed inpatient rehabilitation for TBI. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Data collected included menstrual and reproductive functioning pre- and postinjury, demographic, and injury characteristics. Outcome measures included the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4), and the Medical Outcome Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-12v2). Results The median duration of amenorrhea was 61 days (range, 20-344d). Many subjects' menstrual function changed after TBI, reporting a significant increase in skipped menses postinjury (P Conclusions The severity of TBI was predictive of duration of amenorrhea and a shorter duration of amenorrhea was predictive of better ratings of global outcome, community participation, and health-related quality of life postinjury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.038

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ripley, D. L., Harrison-Felix, C., Sendroy-Terrill, M., Cusick, C. P., Dannels-McClure, A., & Morey, C.
Affiliations
Craig Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ripley, David L.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
1090-1096
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067131324
Cited by
69
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, female reproduction, amenorrhea, menstrual disorders, injury severity, post-traumatic amnesia, health-related quality of life, community participation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amenorrhea, Brain Injuries, Dysmenorrhea, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Injury Severity Score, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review