Cited by 66Lymphatic System and DiseasesCancer survivorship and careStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Weight lifting in patients with lower-extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer: a pilot and feasibility study

Open access
Katz, Elana, Dugan, Nicole L., Cohn, Joy C., Chu, Christina, Smith, Rebecca G., Schmitz, Kathryn H.·2010·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining cancer survivors with lower-limb lymphedema into an exercise intervention study. To develop preliminary estimates regarding the safety and efficacy of this intervention. We hypothesized that progressive weight training would not exacerbate leg swelling and that the intervention would improve functional mobility and quality of life.Design Before-after pilot study with a duration of 5 months.Setting University of Pennsylvania.Participants Cancer survivors with a known diagnosis of lower-limb lymphedema (N=10) were directly referred by University of Pennsylvania clinicians. All 10 participants completed the study.Intervention Twice weekly slowly progressive weight lifting, supervised for 2 months, unsupervised for 3 months.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was interlimb volume differences as measured by optoelectronic perometry. Additional outcome measures included safety (adverse events), muscle strength, objective physical function, and quality of life.Results Interlimb volume differences were 44.4% and 45.3% at baseline and 5 months, respectively (pre-post comparison, P=.70). There were 2 unexpected incident cases of cellulitis within the first 2 months. Both resolved with oral antibiotics and complete decongestive therapy by 5 months. Bench and leg press strength increased by 47% and 27% over 5 months (P=.001 and P=.07, respectively). Distance walked in 6 minutes increased by 7% in 5 months (P=.01). No improvement was noted in self-reported quality of life.Conclusions Recruitment of patients with lower-limb-lymphedema into an exercise program is feasible. Despite some indications that the intervention may be safe (eg, a lack of clinically significant interlimb volume increases over 5 mo), the unexpected finding of 2 cellulitic infections among the 10 participants suggests additional study is required before concluding that patients with lower-extremity lymphedema can safely perform weight lifting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A supervised progressive resistance training program focused on large muscle groups, performed 2-3 times per week with a "start low, progress slow" principle, is safe for upper extremity breast cancer-related lymphedema.

    “For resistance training, a general progressive program focused on large muscle groups performed 2–3 times per week, with the principle of “start low, progress slow” is safe when supervised by a fitness professional(38–42).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 66

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Guyton A Unit IV: The Circulation. Textboook of Medical Physiology 1991 149 271 W.B. Saunders Co Philadelphia 8th ed.

Authors
Katz, E., Dugan, N. L., Cohn, J. C., Chu, C., Smith, R. G., & Schmitz, K. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Good Shepherd Penn Partners (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Schmitz, Kathryn H.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
91
Issue
7
Pages
1070-1076
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059323544
Cited by
66
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
lower limb lymphedema, cancer survivors, weight training, resistance training, leg swelling, muscle strength, functional mobility, quality of life, cellulitis, decongestive therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Lymphedema, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Lower Extremity, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review