Physical Exercise Interventions for Improving Performance-Based Measures of Physical Function in Community-Dwelling, Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective To conduct a systematic review to determine the efficacy of exercise-based interventions on improving performance-based measures of physical function and markers of physical frailty in community-dwelling, frail older people. Data sources Comprehensive bibliographic searches in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, PEDro, and CINAHL databases were conducted (April 2013). Study selection Randomized controlled trials of community-dwelling older adults, defined as frail according to physical function and physical difficulties in activities of daily living (ADL). Included trials had to compare an exercise intervention with a control or another exercise intervention, and assess performance-based measures of physical function such as mobility and gait, or disability in ADL. Data extraction Two review authors independently screened the search results and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Nineteen trials were included, 12 of them comparing exercise with an inactive control. Most exercise programs were multicomponent. Data synthesis Meta-analysis was performed for the comparison of exercise versus control with the inverse variance method under the random-effects models. When compared with control interventions, exercise was shown to improve normal gait speed (mean difference [MD]=.07m/s; 95% confidence interval [CI], .04-.09), fast gait speed (MD=.08m/s; 95% CI, .02-.14), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (MD=2.18; 95% CI, 1.56-2.80). Results are inconc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The older muscle is still able to react to anabolic stimuli of exercise training.
“as the older muscle is still able to react on anabolic stimuli of exercise training (89)(90)(91).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 77 · Cited by 468
- Authors
- Giné-Garriga, M., Roqué-Fíguls, M., Coll-Planas, L., Sitjà-Rabert, M., & Salvà, A.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- ORCID
- Salvà, Antoni
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 753-769.e3
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993056843
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2018-01-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- physical exercise intervention, frailty, community-dwelling older adults, physical function, walking speed, Short Physical Performance Battery, activities of daily living, balance, endurance, multicomponent exercise, exercise modalities
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Postural Balance, Gait, Humans, Exercise, Frail Elderly, Mobility Limitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review