Cited by 468Frailty in Older AdultsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in Aging

Physical Exercise Interventions for Improving Performance-Based Measures of Physical Function in Community-Dwelling, Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Giné-Garriga, Maria, Roqué-Fíguls, Marta, Coll-Planas, Laura, Sitjà-Rabert, Mercè, Salvà, Antoni·2014·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To conduct a systematic review to determine the efficacy of exercise-based interventions on improving performance-based measures of physical function and markers of physical frailty in community-dwelling, frail older people. Data sources Comprehensive bibliographic searches in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, PEDro, and CINAHL databases were conducted (April 2013). Study selection Randomized controlled trials of community-dwelling older adults, defined as frail according to physical function and physical difficulties in activities of daily living (ADL). Included trials had to compare an exercise intervention with a control or another exercise intervention, and assess performance-based measures of physical function such as mobility and gait, or disability in ADL. Data extraction Two review authors independently screened the search results and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Nineteen trials were included, 12 of them comparing exercise with an inactive control. Most exercise programs were multicomponent. Data synthesis Meta-analysis was performed for the comparison of exercise versus control with the inverse variance method under the random-effects models. When compared with control interventions, exercise was shown to improve normal gait speed (mean difference [MD]=.07m/s; 95% confidence interval [CI], .04-.09), fast gait speed (MD=.08m/s; 95% CI, .02-.14), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (MD=2.18; 95% CI, 1.56-2.80). Results are inconc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 77 · Cited by 468

Authors
Giné-Garriga, M., Roqué-Fíguls, M., Coll-Planas, L., Sitjà-Rabert, M., & Salvà, A.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
753-769.e3
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993056843
Cited by
468
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 7
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-01-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
physical exercise intervention, frailty, community-dwelling older adults, physical function, walking speed, Short Physical Performance Battery, activities of daily living, balance, endurance, multicomponent exercise, exercise modalities
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Postural Balance, Gait, Humans, Exercise, Frail Elderly, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review