Cited by 64Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryPhysical Activity and HealthMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The Feasibility and Longitudinal Effects of a Home-Based Sedentary Behavior Change Intervention After Stroke

Ezeugwu, Victor E., Manns, Patricia J.·2018·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a sedentary behavior change intervention on sedentary behavior, physical activity, function, and quality of life following inpatient stroke rehabilitation.Design Single-group, longitudinal, intervention study with 1-week baseline, 8-week intervention, and 8-week follow-up.Setting Community.Participants Individuals (N=34) with subacute stroke recruited within 1 month following discharge home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation.Intervention STand Up Frequently From Stroke (STUFFS) intervention that involved interrupting and replacing sedentary time with upright activities (standing and walking) at home and in the community. A motivational wrist-worn activity monitor was used throughout the intervention.Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were reach (enrolled/eligible), retention (completed/enrolled), satisfaction, and compliance with the intervention. Secondary outcomes were sedentary behavior, physical activity, lower extremity impairment, self-efficacy, cognitive status, mobility, and quality of life outcomes.Results Forty-four participants were eligible to participate. Of the eligible, 34 (77.3%; time since stroke onset: 3.5±1.1 months) were enrolled at baseline and 32 (94.1%) of the enrolled had complete data at follow-up. Satisfaction with the program was 89%. Sedentary time decreased by 54.2±13.7 minutes per day (P<.01) at postintervention and 26.8±14.0 minutes per day (P=.07) at follow-up, relative to baseline. There were significant improvements in walking speed, cognition, impairment, and self-reported quality of life over time (P<.05). Self-efficacy was high across all time points. The number of steps and time spent stepping were not statistically different across both time periods.Conclusions The program was feasible to deliver in the home environment with good retention and satisfaction. Further research is required to test the effectiveness of the STUFFS program compared with usual care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 64

Authors
Ezeugwu, V. E., & Manns, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ezeugwu, Victor E.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
99
Issue
12
Pages
2540-2547
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2835611382
Cited by
64
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates Clinician Fellowship (201600292)
  • Clinical Research Innovation Fund
  • Physiotherapy Foundation of Canada
  • Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation Clinical Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sedentary behavior, stroke rehabilitation, home-based intervention, physical activity, standing and walking, wrist-worn activity monitors, subacute stroke, quality of life, self-efficacy, walking speed, intervention feasibility, retention
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Disability Evaluation, Feasibility Studies, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Stroke, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review