Cited by 57Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesHealth and Wellbeing Research

Physical activity, benefits, and barriers across the aging continuum

Shin, Cha-Nam, Lee, Young-Shin, Belyea, Michael·2018·Applied Nursing Research

Abstract

Background A growing body of evidence indicates the importance of physical activity during midlife period linked to the likelihood of healthy aging, while the likelihood of an individual engaging in physical activity depends largely on their perceived benefits and barriers to being physically active.Aim This study was to examine physical activity levels of midlife Korean American adults and their perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity compared with young and older adults.Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected for a larger descriptive, cross-sectional study that was conducted with a sample of 517 Korean American adults in a Midwestern city. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire.Results A little more than half of the sample were women (57.1%), with a mean age of 41.6 (± 13.4). The study sample met the current guidelines for physical activity far less than the general U.S. population (30.4% -34.6 vs. 51.7%). Less midlife adults met the guidelines for moderate-intensity physical activity than older adults (34.2% vs. 57.4%), while less midlife adults met the guidelines for vigorous-intensity physical activity than young adults (24.8% vs. 40.6%). Midlife adults perceived fewer benefits than did young and older adults.Conclusion The findings indicate that midlife adults are less likely to engage in physical activity and probably more at risk for unhealthy ageing than young and older adults. Understanding benefits and barriers of target population is the first step in developing culturally and age-appropriate intervention to promote physical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 57

Authors
Shin, C.-N., Lee, Y.-S., & Belyea, M.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shin, Cha-Nam
Venue
Applied Nursing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
44
Pages
107-112
ISSN
0897-1897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896776277
Cited by
57
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
physical activity, Korean Americans, middle-aged adults, healthy aging, perceived benefits of physical activity, barriers to physical activity, physical activity guidelines, high-intensity exercise, moderate physical activity, age differences, culturally tailored interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Asian, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Midwestern United States, Health Behavior, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review