Nurses' culturally mediated practices influencing pain care provision for older people in acute care: Ethnographic study
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four empirical studies on groupthink among health professional teams in patient care were identified-two quantitative studies and two qualitative studies.
“We identified four empirical studies on groupthink among health professional teams in patient care—two quantitative studies and two qualitative studies (Table 2) (Allen, 2018; Harmon et al., 2019; Rosander et al., 1998; Snell, 2010).”
From Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as Harmon et al., 2019
Groupthink was observed in various aspects of the work culture: how nurses undertook and interpreted pain documentation; how they viewed and mentored the junior nurses on pain care provision; and the lack of input gathered from older inpatients on their perceptions on pain care provision.
“Groupthink was observed in various aspects of the work culture: how nurses undertook and interpreted pain documentation; how they viewed and mentored the junior nurses on pain care provision; and the lack of input gathered from older inpatients on their perceptions on pain care provision.”
From Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as Harmon et al., 2019
Harmon et al. used focused ethnography to explore pain management and attitudes of nurses towards pain care provision for older patients in acute care units.
“Harmon et al. used focused ethnography to explore pain management and attitudes of nurses towards pain care provision for older patients in acute care units.”
From Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as Harmon et al., 2019
Cites
Jones, P. E., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084914 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review
DiPierro, K., Lee, H., Pain, K. J., Durning, S. J., & Choi, J. J. (2022) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1987404 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harmon, J., Summons, P., & Higgins, I.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Harmon, Joanne
- Venue
- Applied Nursing Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 22-29
- ISSN
- 0897-1897 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944315669
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (acceptedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- pain management, older adults, acute care, nurses, groupthink, evidence-based practice, organizational culture, hospitalized patients
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anthropology, Cultural, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
