Cited by 75Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and Performance

Successive teacher expectation effects across the early school years

Rubie-Davies, Christine M., Weinstein, Rhona S., Huang, Francis L., Gregory, Anne, Cowan, Philip A., Cowan, Carolyn P.·2014·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 75

Authors
Rubie-Davies, C. M., Weinstein, R. S., Huang, F. L., Gregory, A., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Rubie-Davies, Christine M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
181-191
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067530259
Cited by
75
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
teacher expectations, long-term effects, cumulative effects, academic performance, multiple teachers, indirect effects, overestimation of ability, early school years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review