Successive teacher expectation effects across the early school years
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Rubie-Davies, C. M., Weinstein, R. S., Huang, F. L., Gregory, A., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rubie-Davies, Christine M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-191
- ISSN
- 0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067530259
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- teacher expectations, long-term effects, cumulative effects, academic performance, multiple teachers, indirect effects, overestimation of ability, early school years
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review