Cited by 116Child Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEducational Methods and Impacts

Parental perceptions of technology and technology-focused parenting: Associations with youth screen time

Open access
Sanders, Wesley, Parent, Justin, Forehand, Rex, Sullivan, Alexandra D.W., Jones, Deborah J.·2016·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Abstract

In the present study we propose a model linking parental perceptions of technology to technology-related parenting strategies to youth screen time, and, finally, to internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors. Participants were 615 parents drawn from three community samples of families with children across three developmental stages: young childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence. The model was tested at each stage with the strongest support emerging in the young childhood sample. One component of parental perceptions of technology, perceived efficacy, was related to technology-related parenting strategies across developmental stages. However, the association of these strategies to child screen time and, in turn, problem behaviors, diminished as children increased in age. Implications for intervention are considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 116

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Little TD 2013 The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, volume 1: Foundations New York, NY Oxford University Press
  2. McKee L Jones DJ Forehand R Cuellar J 2013 Assessment of parenting style, parenting relationships, and other parent variables in child assessment Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents 788 821 New York Oxford
  3. Patterson GR Forehand R 2005 Parents and adolescents living together 1 2 Champaign, Illinois Research Press

Authors
Sanders, W., Parent, J., Forehand, R., Sullivan, A. D. W., & Jones, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Sanders, Wesley
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
44
Pages
28-38
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2298359268
Cited by
116
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
25.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
Child and Adolescent Psychology Training and Research, Inc. (R01MH100377, NICHD RO1HD064723)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
internalizing problems, externalizing problems, perceived efficacy, parenting strategies, developmental stages, childhood, adolescence, middle childhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review