Cited by 26Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Is the desire to eat familiar and unfamiliar meat products influenced by the emotions expressed on eaters’ faces?

Rousset, S., Schlich, P., Chatonnier, A., Barthomeuf, L., Droit-Volet, S.·2008·Appetite

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test if the social context represented by eaters' faces expressing emotions can modulate the desire to eat meat, especially for unfamiliar meat products. Forty-four young men and women were presented with two series of photographs. The first series (non-social context) was composed of eight meat pictures, four unfamiliar and four familiar. The second series (social context) consisted of the same pictures presented with eaters expressing three different emotions: disgust, pleasure or neutrality. For every picture, the participants were asked to estimate the intensity of their desire to eat the meat product viewed on the picture. Results showed that meat desire depended on interactions between product familiarity, social context and the participant's gender. In the non-social context, the men liked the familiar meat products more than the women, whereas their desire to eat unfamiliar meat products was similar. Compared to the non-social context, viewing another person eating with a neutral and a happy facial expression increased the desire to eat. Furthermore, the increase in the desire to eat meat associated with happy faces was greater for the unfamiliar than for the familiar meat products in men, and greater for the familiar than for the unfamiliar meats in women. In the presence of disgusted faces, the desire to eat meat remained constant for unfamiliar products in all participants whereas it only decreased for familiar products in men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2007.06.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 26

Authors
Rousset, S., Schlich, P., Chatonnier, A., Barthomeuf, L., & Droit-Volet, S.
Affiliations
  • Unité de Nutrition Humaine (FR)
  • Université de Bourgogne (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Rousset, S.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
110-119
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172067367
Cited by
26
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  • Conseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
product familiarity, facial expressions, social environment, disgust, pleasure, gender differences, food liking
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Cattle, Facial Expression, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Meat Products, Photography, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Swine, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review