“Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges
Abstract
Adapting Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges requires an overall reduction of industrially produced animal proteins plus a partial replacement by plant proteins. Combining insights on food, environment, and consumers, this paper aims to explore change strategies that may help to meet these challenges, such as promoting smaller portions of meat ("less"), smaller portions using meat raised in a more sustainable manner ("less but better"), smaller portions and eating more vegetable protein ("less and more varied"), and meatless meals with or without meat substitutes ("veggie-days"). The underlying logic of the strategies was clarified by analyzing dietary choices. A nationwide sample of 1083 Dutch consumers provided information on current eating practices and potential changes. The results show that strategies to change meat eating frequencies and meat portion sizes will appeal to overlapping but partly different segments of consumers and that these strategies can be applied to address consumers in terms of their own preferences. The strategies appeared to have different strengths and weaknesses, making them complementary pathways to facilitate step-by-step changes in the amounts and the sources of protein consumed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 355
- Authors
- de Boer, J., Schösler, H., & Aiking, H.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 120-128
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161723986
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- meat consumption, plant proteins, sustainable diets, customer segmentation, meat substitutes, dietary habits, Western diet
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Choice Behavior, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vegetables, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Portion Size, Diet, Western
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review