Cited by 51Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management

How practice contributes to trolley food waste. A qualitative study among staff involved in serving meals to hospital patients

Ofei, K.T., Holst, M., Rasmussen, H.H., Mikkelsen, B.E.·2014·Appetite

Abstract

This study investigated the generation of trolley food waste at the ward level in a hospital in order to provide recommendations for how practice could be changed to reduce food waste. Three separate focus group discussions were held with four nurses, four dietitians and four service assistants engaged in food service. Furthermore, single qualitative interviews were conducted with a nurse, a dietitian and two service assistants. Observations of procedures around trolley food serving were carried out during lunch and supper for a total of 10 weekdays in two different wards. All unserved food items discarded as waste were weighed after each service. Analysis of interview and observation data revealed five key themes. The findings indicate that trolley food waste generation is a practice embedded within the limitations related to the procedures of meal ordering. This includes portion size choices and delivery, communication, tools for menu information, portioning and monitoring of food waste, as well as the use of unserved food. Considering positive changes to these can be a way forward to develop strategies to reduce trolley food waste at the ward level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some units experienced the trolley meal system as a strategy to adapt the meal with the patient's desires and to minimize food waste.

    “Some units experienced the trolley meal 662 system as a strategy to adapt the meal with the patient's desires [52] and to minimize food 663 waste.”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ofei, K. T., Holst, M., Rasmussen, H. H., & Mikkelsen, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Ofei, K.T.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
83
Pages
49-56
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025493697
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Keywords
hospital food service, food waste reduction, portion size, menu information, food waste monitoring, nurses, dietitians
MeSH terms
Communication, Dietetics, Food Preferences, Food Service, Hospital, Hospitals, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Menu Planning, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction, Observation, Qualitative Research, Meals, Portion Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review