Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers’ perception of protein products
Abstract
Food production and consumption have major impacts on the environment. At the same time, changes in human diets worldwide are increasingly leading to health problems. Both issues are highly influenced by consumers' everyday food choices and could be addressed by reducing consumption of meat and other animal products. To promote sustainable food consumption, we need to know how consumers perceive the environmental friendliness and healthiness of food products, on which criteria they base their evaluations of environmental friendliness and healthiness, and how their estimations relate to life cycle assessments and nutrient profiling. We presented 30 protein products, which varied in provenance, production methods, and processing, to 85 participants from Switzerland. They were asked to sort the products once according to their perceived environmental friendliness and once according to their perceived healthiness. The mean distances between the products were compared to the products' life cycle assessments and nutrient profiles. The results showed that perceived environmental friendliness and healthiness are highly correlated. The main predictors of the products' perceived environmental friendliness were product category, presence of an organic label, and provenance; and for perceived healthiness, these predictors were product category, fat content, processing, and presence of an organic label. Environmental friendliness and healthiness estimations were significantly correlated to the life cycle assessments and the nutrient profiles of the products, respectively. Hence, to promote healthy and environmentally friendly food choices, motivators related to environmental friendliness and healthiness could be used in synergy. Awareness about meat's environmental impact should be increased and better information is needed for consumers to make an accurate environmental impact and healthiness assessments of protein products.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These results were partly in line with a study performed in the USA which showed that healthy and unhealthy food was especially defined by food additives, nutrient content, food packaging, and production and processing methods.
“These results were partly in line with a study performed in the USA (using low income, predominantly black community participants), which showed that healthy and unhealthy food was especially defined by food additives, nutrient content, food packaging, and production and processing methods [125].”
From Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [125]
This was not in line with research showing that 85 Swiss participants indicated that organic labels and provenance were among the main predictors of the products' perceived environmental friendliness.
“This was not in line with research showing that 85 Swiss participants indicated that organic labels and provenance were among the main predictors of the products’ perceived environmental friendliness [125].”
From Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [125]
Cites
Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors
Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Self-citationMeat Intake and Mortality: A Prospective Study of Over Half a Million People
Sinha, R., Cross, A. J., Graubard, B. I., Leitzmann, M. F., & Schatzkin, A. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.6 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petrescu, D. C., Vermeir, I., & Petrescu-Mag, R. M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010169 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
de Araújo, P. D., Araújo, W. M. C., Patarata, L., & Fraqueza, M. J. (2022) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108952 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lazzarini, G. A., Zimmermann, J., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Lazzarini, Gianna A.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 663-673
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2461631791
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Keywords
- perceived environmental friendliness, perceived healthiness, protein products, sustainable food consumption, meat consumption, organic food labeling, food origin, life cycle assessment, nutrient profiling, consumer food choice, fat content, food processing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Female, Food Labeling, Food Preferences, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Nutritive Value, Social Environment, Switzerland, Young Adult, Food, Organic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review