Cited by 101Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsMultisensory perception and integrationFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis

“Smooth operator”: Music modulates the perceived creaminess, sweetness, and bitterness of chocolate

Open access
Reinoso Carvalho, Felipe, Wang, Qian (Janice), van Ee, Raymond, Persoone, Dominique, Spence, Charles·2017·Appetite

Abstract

There has been a recent growth of interest in determining whether sound (specifically music and soundscapes) can enhance not only the basic taste attributes associated with food and beverage items (such as sweetness, bitterness, sourness, etc.), but also other important components of the tasting experience, such as, for instance, crunchiness, creaminess, and/or carbonation. In the present study, participants evaluated the perceived creaminess of chocolate. Two contrasting soundtracks were produced with such texture-correspondences in mind, and validated by means of a pre-test. The participants tasted the same chocolate twice (without knowing that the chocolates were identical), each time listening to one of the soundtracks. The 'creamy' soundtrack enhanced the perceived creaminess and sweetness of the chocolates, as compared to the ratings given while listening to the 'rough' soundtrack. Moreover, while the participants preferred the creamy soundtrack, this difference did not appear to affect their overall enjoyment of the chocolates. Interestingly, and in contrast with previous similar studies, these results demonstrate that in certain cases, sounds can have a perceptual effect on gustatory food attributes without necessarily altering the hedonic experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.026

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 101

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bronner, K., Bruhn, H., Hirt, R., & Piper, D. (2012). What is the sound of citrus? 490 Research on the correspondences between the perception of sound and flavour. In 491 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition 492 (ICMPC) and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive 493 Sciences of Music (ESCOM) 2012, pp. 142-148, Thessaloniki, Greece. 494
  2. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., Leman, M. & 541 Rychtarikova, M., (2015c). Assessing multisensory tasting experiences by means of 542 customized sonic cues. In Proceedings of Euronoise 2015, 352 (pp. 1-6). Maastricht 543
  3. Spence, C. (2016). Sound bites and digital seasoning. In Sorensen, V. (Ed.), Sound, 569 2016, Special Issue: Proceedings of Si15, Singapore, August 2015], pp. 9-15. 571

Authors
Reinoso Carvalho, F., Wang, Q. (., van Ee, R., Persoone, D., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
108
Pages
383-390
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2534851722
Cited by
101
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (BEX 3488/13-6)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (METH/14/02)
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L007053/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Keywords
soundscape, chocolate, perceived sweetness, taste perception, food enjoyment
MeSH terms
Chocolate, Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Choice Behavior, Eating, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Music, Pilot Projects, Taste, Taste Perception, Young Adult, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review