Cited by 67Obesity, Physical Activity, DietHealth disparities and outcomesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

A systematic review of psychosocial explanations for the relationship between socioeconomic status and body mass index

Open access
Claassen, Maria Almudena, Klein, Olivier, Bratanova, Boyka, Claes, Nele, Corneille, Olivier·2019·Appetite

Abstract

A negative association between socioeconomic status (SES) and levels of overweight/obesity is consistently found in high- and middle-income countries. Yet, there is little conclusive evidence about the mechanisms driving this association. In this systematic review, we discuss and compare the results of 22 studies that examine the role of psychosocial mediators in the association between SES and BMI in diverse population samples. These include factors related to resources and constraints in one's external neighborhood, social resources, and psychological factors such as stress. The findings support theoretical models indicating that SES is related to BMI partially through environmental and psychological factors. Importantly, SES often remains a significant predictor of weight status, indicating the importance of also addressing structural antecedents in order to improve health among lower SES populations. We thoroughly discuss the quality and limitations of current study designs and mediation testing and provide recommendations for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 67

Authors
Claassen, M. A., Klein, O., Bratanova, B., Claes, N., & Corneille, O.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Claassen, Maria Almudena
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
132
Pages
208-221
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890111862
Cited by
67
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Walloon Region (FOOD4GUT)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
socioeconomic status, body mass index, obesity, overweight, psychosocial mediators, neighborhood environment, social resources, psychological stress, mediation analysis, structural determinants of health, low-income populations
MeSH terms
Humans, Income, Obesity, Residence Characteristics, Social Class, Stress, Psychological, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review