Conceptualizing addictive-like eating: A qualitative analysis
Abstract
Debates regarding addictive-like eating have generated several conceptualizations of this construct. Qualitative research helps ensure that conceptualizations capture how individuals may experience addictive-like eating. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with ten participants who identified themselves as addicted to food, or to food and eating, to determine how they conceptualized their addictive-like eating. Using thematic analysis, we identified four themes: (1) Social Environment, describing how past and present social environments affected addictive-like eating; (2) Situational Cues, encompassing situational contributions to addictive-like eating; (3) Persistent Cognitions, including preoccupation with food and loss of control; and (4) Impact of Weight, encompassing weight gain and its perceived impact on health, body image, and distress. Participants described properties specific to their preferred foods, as well as environmental and cognitive factors contributing to addictive-like eating. These descriptions were not completely captured by either the substance-based "food addiction" or behavioural "eating addiction" frameworks, though characteristics consistent with both were present. Further, existing scales of addictive-like eating do not assess the impact of social and situational cues, suggesting a need for new or revised measures. We propose a working definition of addictive-like eating that incorporates the characteristics described.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Qualitative interviews have found that the YFAS does not adequately assess social and situational cues for overeating.
“Qualitative interviews have found that the YFAS does not adequately assess social and situational cues for overeating [224].”
From Separating the Signal from the Noise: How Psychiatric Diagnoses Can Help Discern Food Addiction from Dietary Restraint (2020) · cites this paper as [224]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Paterson, C., Lacroix, E., & von Ranson, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 104326
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2952994203
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- food addiction, social environment, situational cues, food preoccupation, loss of control, weight gain, body image, working definition, measurement scales
- MeSH terms
- Self-Control, Food Addiction, Adult, Body Image, Cues, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Social Environment, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review