I was truly addicted to sugar: A consumer-focused classification system of behaviour change strategies for sugar reduction
Open accessAbstract
The reduction of free sugars has been identified as a priority issue internationally. A range of public health initiatives have been recommended, including the provision of information and support for sugar reduction. To inform these approaches, it is important to know what people actually do in real world settings to reduce their consumption. This study documents and defines the range of consumer-based behaviour change strategies for sugar reduction. A total of 1145 strategies were extracted from 47 internet sources (i.e., consumer, popular and professional). Using a pragmatic content analysis, hundreds of strategies were organized into 25 discrete categories of strategies. Categories were grouped into the Rubicon Model of Action Phases and classified as pre-decisional (i.e., decisional balance, feedback, realisation, seek knowledge and information), post-decisional (i.e., action planning, coping planning, set goal intention, sugar guidelines) and actional phase. Actional strategies were the most prolific and included avoidance, consumption control, consumption planning, environmental restructuring, healthy eating focus, maintain readiness, professional support, refocusing, self-monitoring, social support, substance substitution, tapering, address underlying issues, urge management, well-being and withdrawal management. There was one post-actional strategy which was associated with self-evaluation (i.e., reviewing a change attempt in order to plan for the future). Four categories of strategies differed according to the source. Substance substitution was substantially less frequently discussed by consumers than professionals and few professional sites acknowledged or advised strategies to manage the struggle of maintaining readiness following a change attempt. Hundreds of individual strategies are discussed or promoted in online settings, and more information is needed on the effectiveness of these self-initiated approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study of 47 different internet sources, self-perceived sugar addicts shared actional strategies that worked for them.
“In a study of 47 different internet sources, self-perceived sugar addicts shared actional strategies that worked for them, including avoidance, consumption planning, environmental restructuring, professional and social support, addressing underlying issues, and urge management, among others [23].”
From Separating the Signal from the Noise: How Psychiatric Diagnoses Can Help Discern Food Addiction from Dietary Restraint (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Rodda, S. N., Booth, N., Brittain, M., McKean, J., & Thornley, S.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Rodda, Simone N.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 104456
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972363652
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Research Council of New Zealand (17/548)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- sugar reduction, free sugars, behavior change strategies, consumer behavior, self-monitoring, social support, substance substitution, tapering, environmental restructuring, online health information, professional guidance, consumer advice
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Dietary Sugars, Food Addiction, Humans, Nutrition Policy, Behavior Control, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Search Engine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review