Impact of activity space on the reproductive behaviour of giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in captivity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Failure to reproduce in captivity has been consistently linked to stress from sustained confinement in sub-optimal conditions and reduced opportunity for social interaction.
“Failure to reproduce in captivity has been consistently linked to stress from sustained confinement in sub-optimal conditions (Descovich et al., 2012; Peng et al., 2007), and reduced opportunity for social interaction (Mallapur et al., 2006; Swaisgood and Schulte, 2010).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Peng et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Peng, J., Jiang, Z., Qin, G., Huang, Q., Li, Y., Jiao, Z., Zhang, F., Li, Z., Zhang, J., Lu, Y., Liu, X., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Peng, Jianjun
- Jiang, Zhigang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 151-161
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969117716
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- giant panda, activity space, reproductive behavior, captive animals, space size, zoo animal welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
