Stroking of different body regions by a human: Effects on behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stroking animals in a similar manner to intraspecific allogrooming reduces heart rate and results in relaxed body postures in cattle and lambs.
“For example, studies have also demonstrated that stroking animals in a similar manner to intraspecific allogrooming reduces heart rate and results in relaxed body postures in cattle [22] and lambs [23].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Hennessy, M. B., T. Williams, M., Miller, D. D., Douglas, C. W., & Voith, V. L. (1998) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(98)00179-8 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“For example, studies have also demonstrated that stroking animals in a similar manner to intraspecific allogrooming reduces heart rate and results in relaxed body postures in cattle [22] and lambs [23].”
- Authors
- Schmied, C., Waiblinger, S., Scharl, T., Leisch, F., & Boivin, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
- TU Wien (AT)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Waiblinger, Susanne
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-38
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047213474
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Keywords
- dairy cattle, social grooming, licking behavior, heart rate, neck stretching, head shaking, human-animal interaction, cattle welfare, human presence, withers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
