The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the human–horse relationship
Open accessAbstract
Despite a long history of human–horse relationship, horse-related incidents and accidents do occur amongst professional and non professional horse handlers. Recent studies show that their occurrence depend more on the frequency and amount of interactions with horses than on the level of competency, suggesting a strong need for specific research and training of individuals working with horses. In the present study, we review the current scientific knowledge on human–horse relationships. We distinguish here short occasional interactions with familiar or unfamiliar horses (e.g. veterinary inspection) and long-term bonds (e.g. horse–owner). An important aspect of the horse–human relationship is to try and improve the development and maintenance of a strong positive relationship. Studies show that deficits in the management conditions (housing, feeding, possibilities for social contact, and training methods) may lead to relational problems between horses and humans. Different methods have been used to assess and improve the human–horse relation, especially at the young age. They reveal that the time and type of contact all play a role, while recent studies suggest that the use of familiarized social models might be a great help through social facilitation. We argue that an important theoretical framework could be Hinde's [Hinde, R., 1979. Towards Understanding Relationships. Academic Press, Londres] definition of a relationship as an emerging bond from a series of interactions: partners have expectations on the next interaction on the basis of the previous ones. Understanding that a relationship is built up on the basis of a succession of interactions is an important step as it suggests that attention is being paid to the “positive” or “negative” valence of each interaction as a step for the next one. A better knowledge of learning rules is certainly necessary in this context not only to train the horse but also to counterbalance the unavoidable negative inputs that exist in routine procedures and reduce their impact on the relationship. It appears clearly that research is needed in order to assess how to better and safely approach the horse (e.g. research in position, posture, gaze, etc.), what type of approaches and timing may help in developing a positive bond, what influence human management and care have on the relationship, and how this can be adapted to have a positive influence on the relationship. Also the interaction between rider and horse, the search for the optimal match between two individuals, is an aspect of the horse–human relationship that requires attention in order to decrease the number of horse-riding accidents and reduced states of welfare. On the other hand, adequate knowledge is readily available that may improve the present situation rapidly. Developing awareness and attention to behavioural cues given by horses would certainly help decreasing accidents among professionals when interacting. Scientists therefore should play a major role in transmitting not only elements of the current knowledge of the ethology of the horse but also by helping developing observational skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?
Gosling, S. D. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.1.45 · Cited by 1,695
Towards understanding relationships
Hinde, R. A. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 943
Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review
Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., Tosi, M.-V., Janczak, A. M., Visser, E. K., & Jones, R. B. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001 · Cited by 751
Self-citationThe Behaviour and Social Organization of the New Forest Ponies
Tyler, S. J. (1972) · Animal Behaviour Monographs · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(72)90003-6 · Cited by 493
Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred horse
MCGREEVY, P. D., CRIPPS, P. J., FRENCH, N. P., GREEN, L. E., & NICOL, C. J. (1995) · Equine Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03041.x · Cited by 363
Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses
VISSER, E., VANREENEN, C., VANDERWERF, J., SCHILDER, M., KNAAP, J., BARNEVELD, A., & BLOKHUIS, H. (2002) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00698-4 · Cited by 352
Self-citationPritchard, J. C., Lindberg, A. C., Main, D. C. J., & Whay, H. R. (2005) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.002 · Cited by 344
Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare
Rushen, J., Taylor, A. A., & de Passillé, A. M. (1999) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00089-1 · Cited by 331
WATERS, A. J., NICOL, C. J., & FRENCH, N. P. (2002) · Equine Veterinary Journal · doi:10.2746/042516402776180241 · Cited by 280
The Inevitable bond: examining scientist-animal interactions
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-2665 · Cited by 278
Cited by
The Domestication Makeup: Evolution, Survival, and Challenges
Ahmad, H. I., Ahmad, M. J., Jabbir, F., Ahmar, S., Ahmad, N., Elokil, A. A., & Chen, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00103 · Cited by 98
Williams, J., & Tabor, G. (2017) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.019 · Cited by 83
Exploring the existence and potential underpinnings of dog–human and horse–human attachment bonds
Payne, E., DeAraugo, J., Bennett, P., & McGreevy, P. (2016) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.004 · Cited by 81
Reactivity to humans and fearfulness tests: Field validation in Polish Cold Blood Horses
Górecka-Bruzda, A., Jastrzębska, E., Sosnowska, Z., Jaworski, Z., Jezierski, T., & Chruszczewski, M. H. (2011) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.011 · Cited by 45
Le Neindre, P., Dunier, M., Larrere, R., & Prunet, P. (2018) · doi:10.35690/978-2-7592-2871-3 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Hausberger, M., Roche, H., Henry, S., & Visser, E. K.
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101816340
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the human–horse relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015
- The paper
- Hausberger, M., Roche, H., Henry, S., & Visser, E. K. (2008). A review of the human–horse relationship. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.