Cited by 9Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesMarine animal studies overviewAvian ecology and behavior

Validation and welfare assessment of flipper-mounted time-depth recorders for monitoring penguins in zoos and aquariums

Fuller, Grace, Heintz, Matthew R., Allard, Stephanie·2019·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuller, G., Heintz, M. R., & Allard, S.
Corresponding author
Fuller, Grace
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
212
Pages
114-122
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910032909
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
time-depth recorders, animal welfare assessment, king penguin, gentoo penguin, macaroni penguin, southern rockhopper penguin, aquatic behavior, agonistic behavior, mating competition, device validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review