Female mate choice significantly increases captive breeding success, and scents can be frozen to determine choice, in the stripe-faced dunnart
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In practical experiments, several species experienced greater pair and reproductive success when paired with males they demonstrated a scent preference for.
“In practical experiments using this method several species, including stripe-faced dunnart [23], cheetah [47], and harvest mouse (Micromys minutus [48]), experienced greater pair and reproductive success when paired with the males they demonstrated a scent preference for.”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
The reproductive strategy of an animal varies by species, including female choice or rejection, male selection, and coercive strategies.
“The reproductive strategy of an animal varies depending on the species; for example, in some animals, the female chooses or rejects the males (striped-faced dunnarts Sminthopsis macroura [23]), [24] while in others, males select the females [25] sometimes using coercive strategies [13].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
In stripe-faced dunnarts, freezing scent samples for up to 40 days did not impact scent preference in females.
“Furthermore, in their study of stripe-faced dunnarts, Parrott et al. [23] demonstrated that freezing scent samples for up to 40 days did not impact scent preference in females, indicating that such methods may be broadly useful even for potential pairs who live significant distances apart.”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Methods of human body odor sampling: The effect of freezing
Lenochova, P., Roberts, S. C., & Havlicek, J. (2008) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjn067 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The reproductive strategy of an animal varies depending on the species; for example, in some animals, the female chooses or rejects the males (striped-faced dunnarts Sminthopsis macroura [23]), [24] while in others, males select the females [25] sometimes using coercive strategies [13].”
- Authors
- Parrott, M. L., Nation, A., & Selwood, L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Parrott, Marissa L.
- ORCID
- Parrott, Marissa L.
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 214
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921542071
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Melbourne
- Australian Academy of Science Margaret Middleton Fund
- Winifred Violet Scott Charitable Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- female mate choice, Sminthopsis macroura, captive breeding, breeding success, olfactory cues, inbreeding, relatedness, male age, endangered species conservation, marsupials, pregnancy rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review