Cited by 26Animal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Female mate choice significantly increases captive breeding success, and scents can be frozen to determine choice, in the stripe-faced dunnart

Parrott, Marissa L., Nation, Angela, Selwood, Lynne·2019·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.03.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In practical experiments, several species experienced greater pair and reproductive success when paired with males they demonstrated a scent preference for.

    “In practical experiments using this method several species, including stripe-faced dunnart [23], cheetah [47], and harvest mouse (Micromys minutus [48]), experienced greater pair and reproductive success when paired with the males they demonstrated a scent preference for.”
  • The reproductive strategy of an animal varies by species, including female choice or rejection, male selection, and coercive strategies.

    “The reproductive strategy of an animal varies depending on the species; for example, in some animals, the female chooses or rejects the males (striped-faced dunnarts Sminthopsis macroura [23]), [24] while in others, males select the females [25] sometimes using coercive strategies [13].”
  • In stripe-faced dunnarts, freezing scent samples for up to 40 days did not impact scent preference in females.

    “Furthermore, in their study of stripe-faced dunnarts, Parrott et al. [23] demonstrated that freezing scent samples for up to 40 days did not impact scent preference in females, indicating that such methods may be broadly useful even for potential pairs who live significant distances apart.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parrott, M. L., Nation, A., & Selwood, L.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Parrott, Marissa L.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
214
Pages
95-101
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921542071
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Melbourne
  • Australian Academy of Science Margaret Middleton Fund
  • Winifred Violet Scott Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
female mate choice, Sminthopsis macroura, captive breeding, breeding success, olfactory cues, inbreeding, relatedness, male age, endangered species conservation, marsupials, pregnancy rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review