Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latest developments on TES and CSP technologies – Energy and environmental issues, applications and research trends

Achkari, O., El Fadar, A.·2020·Applied Thermal Engineering

Abstract

Abstract The concentrating solar power (CSP) technology is promising especially for countries having an abundance of solar resources in order to secure their energy supply, reduce their carbon footprint and consequently achieve sustainable development goals. Furthermore, the thermal energy storage (TES), when combined with CSP plants, offers the opportunity to make these plants economically competitive and reliable during their operation and could balance supply and demand of energy by reducing the undesirable impacts of the solar energy intermittency. This paper presents a review on TES systems and an update of the latest developments of different technologies of TES that are commercially available or under investigation. Various aspects are discussed including the limits of each technology, different new concepts to enhance the heat transfer efficiency, the principal applications and the environmental issues associated with the integration of TES in solar thermal CSP plants. The results of the current review have revealed that despite the important thermo-physical characteristics of latent heat and thermo-chemical heat storage systems, such as high TES density, they are still at a laboratory level and their development is still far from any proven design and material to be transferred to a commercial scale, especially for high temperature applications. In contrast, the liquid sensible heat storage (SHS) systems are the most mature and the most used in CSP plants. Indeed, according to a census survey that we carried out, based on data compiled by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Global Energy Observatory (GEO) about CSP projects around the world that are either operational or under development, 45.5% of the operational CSP plants worldwide (i.e. 45.1% of the total installed capacity) are equipped with TES and 95.6% of them (i.e. 99.8% of the total installed capacity) use liquid SHS materials due to their reliability, low cost and easy operation. Economically, the integration of TES systems into large scale CSP plants is a cost-effective way for the widespread deployment of CSP technology, by reducing the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), especially for solar power tower (SPT) technology over parabolic trough collector (PTC) one, thanks to the high temperature differential occurred in the storage system that reduces the amount of required TES materials. However, owing to its longer commercial operational experience and less technical and financial risks, the PTC is currently the most commonly used technology in CSP plants. Regarding the environmental side, a case study about Moroccan CSP has quantitatively highlighted the environmental potential of integrating TES in CSP plants for electricity production in order to mitigate significantly the greenhouse gases emissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114806

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 133 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Achkari, O., & El Fadar, A.
Venue
Applied Thermal Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
167
Pages
114806
ISSN
1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996001557
Cited by
341
References
133
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Latest developments on TES and CSP technologies – Energy and environmental issues, applications and research trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114806
The paper
Achkari, O., & El Fadar, A. (2020). Latest developments on TES and CSP technologies – Energy and environmental issues, applications and research trends. Applied Thermal Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114806

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.