Abiotic factors affect the performance of the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus
Abstract
Abiotic factors constitute one of the most important drivers shaping soil ecosystems. Although being a strongly buffered environment, soil heterogeneous nature combined with the limited mobility of its organisms can make them highly sensitive to unfavourable conditions. A thorough knowledge of these relationships is thus a critical starting point to understand the challenges posed to edaphic organisms in a context of global environmental changes and the implications arising therefrom. In this study we evaluated the influence of temperature, soil moisture and UV radiation on the performance of the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus using several endpoints: survival, locomotor activity, feeding parameters and avoidance behaviour. At the range assessed, temperature did not affect isopods’ survival but showed marked effects on sublethal endpoints. Both feeding parameters and locomotor activity showed a right-shifted response with gradual temperature-induced optimisation in isopods’ performance until reaching an optimum temperature and abruptly declining thereafter. On the contrary, soil moisture was found to significantly affect isopods’ survival but the effects on the feeding parameters were not clear. Although exhibiting a clear preference for intermediate soil moistures, isopods were particularly sensitive to drier environments since higher percentages of avoidance were found. UV radiation affected survival, body weight and locomotor performance. Abiotic factors affect soil organisms at relevant conditions and must therefore be considered while developing tools for edaphic ecosystems’ protection such as ecotoxicological testing and further environmental risk assessment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Silverman, J., & Rust, M. K. (1983) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/12.2.490 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Morgado, R., Ferreira, N. G. C., Cardoso, D. N., Soares, A. M. V. M., & Loureiro, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Aveiro (PT)
- Universidade Federal do Tocantins (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Morgado, Rui
- Loureiro, Susana
- Venue
- Applied Soil Ecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 161-170
- ISSN
- 0929-1393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W929895464
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Soil Ecology (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Funds
- National Funds
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Keywords
- Porcellionides pruinosus, terrestrial isopods, abiotic factors, soil temperature, soil moisture, ultraviolet radiation, survival, locomotor activity, feeding performance, avoidance behavior, thermal optimum, ecotoxicity testing, environmental risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review