CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soil amendments yield persisting effects on the microbial communities - a 7-year study

Open access
Reardon, Catherine L., Wuest, Stewart B.·2016·Applied Soil Ecology
DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Soil microbial communities are sensitive to carbon amendments and largely control the decomposition and accumulation of soil organic matter. In this study, we evaluated whether the type of carbon amendment applied to wheat-cropped or fallow soil imparted lasting effects on the microbial community with detectable differences in activity, population size, or community structure after a period of seven years post-amendment. The microbial communities from the top 10cm of soil were analyzed for activity related to C-cycling (glucosidase, galactosidase), P-cycling (acid phosphatase), S-cycling (arylsulfatase), and N-cycling (β-glucosaminidase, arylamidase), in addition to fungal and bacterial abundance and structure. The amendments were applied at similar carbon rates for five years under annual wheat or continuous fallow and included cotton linters, sucrose, wheat residue, composted wheat residue, brassica residue, wood sawdust, alfalfa feed pellets, manure, biosolid and a no treatment control. Two crops, brassica and grass, were in the fallow treatments. The majority of the communities in the amended soils were not distinguishable from the no-treatment control. For amendments and crops that produced changes, significant differences in the population size and community structure were observable for fungi but not bacteria. Wood, sugar, and grass cropping produced the most pronounced effects on enzyme activity, fungal abundance and structure. Overall, the species of the planted crop had a significant effect on the soil enzyme activity and population size of fungi, with the greatest values under grass compared to wheat or brassica. The microbial communities were differentially affected by C source amendments in which the persistency of change and the aspect of the community affected (i.e. function, size, structure, kingdom) were dependent on amendment type.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Acosta-Martínez, 2007, Microbial communities and enzyme activities in soils under alternative crop rotations compared to wheat–fallow for the Central Great Plains, Appl. Soil. Ecol, 37, 41, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.03.009 · DOI
  2. Acosta-Martínez, 2000, Arylamidase activity of soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 215, 10.2136/sssaj2000.641215x · DOI
  3. Acosta-Martínez, 2000, Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil, Biol. Fert. Soils, 31, 85, 10.1007/s003740050628 · DOI
  4. Acosta-Martínez, 2001, Tillage and residue management effects on arylamidase activity in soils, Biol. Fert. Soils, 34, 21, 10.1007/s003740100349 · DOI
  5. Acosta-Martinez, 2004, Soil microbial: chemical and physical properties in continuous cotton and integrated crop–livestock systems, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 1875, 10.2136/sssaj2004.1875 · DOI
  6. Allison, 2009, Low levels of nitrogen addition stimulate decomposition by boreal forest fungi, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 293, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.032 · DOI
  7. Allison, 2008, Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 11512, 10.1073/pnas.0801925105 · DOI
  8. Allison, 2005, Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 937, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014 · DOI
  9. Angers, 1993, Microbial and biochemical changes induced by rotation and tillage in a soil under barley production, Can. J. Soil Sci., 73, 39, 10.4141/cjss93-004 · DOI
  10. Badri, 2009, Regulation and function of root exudates, Plant Cell Environ., 32, 666, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01926.x · DOI
  11. Barbarick, 2004, Biosolids effects on microbial activity in shrubland and grassland soils, Soil. Sci., 169, 176, 10.1097/01.ss.0000122525.03492.fe · DOI
  12. Cleveland, 2007, Increases in soil respiration following labile carbon additions linked to rapid shifts in soil microbial community composition, Biogeochemistry, 82, 229, 10.1007/s10533-006-9065-z · DOI
  13. Culman, 2009, T-REX: software for the processing and analysis of T-RFLP data, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 171, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-171 · DOI
  14. Dodor, 2002, Effects of cropping systems and microbial biomass on arylamidase activity in soils, Biol Fert. Soils, 35, 253, 10.1007/s00374-002-0465-5 · DOI
  15. Ekenler, 2002, β-Glucosaminidase activity of soils: effect of cropping systems and its relationship to nitrogen mineralization, Biol. Fert. Soils, 36, 367, 10.1007/s00374-002-0541-x · DOI
  16. Engelking, 2007, Microbial use of maize cellulose and sugarcane sucrose monitored by changes in the 13 C/12 C ratio, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 1888, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.002 · DOI
  17. Engelking, 2007, Shifts in amino sugar and ergosterol contents after addition of sucrose and cellulose to soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 2111, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.020 · DOI
  18. Engelking, 2008, Formation and use of microbial residues after adding sugarcane sucrose to a heated soil devoid of soil organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 40, 97, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.009 · DOI
  19. Eschen, 2007, Carbon addition alters vegetation composition on ex-arable fields, J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 95, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01240.x · DOI
  20. Frankenberger, 1983, Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47, 945, 10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700050021x · DOI
  21. Gardes, 1993, ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts, Mol. Ecol., 2, 113, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x · DOI
  22. Geisseler, 2009, Relationship between carbon and nitrogen availability and extracellular enzyme activities in soil, Pedobiologia, 53, 87, 10.1016/j.pedobi.2009.06.002 · DOI
  23. Grayston, 1998, Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere, Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 369, 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00124-7 · DOI
  24. Griffiths, 1998, Soil microbial community structure: Effects of substrate loading rates, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 145, 10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00117-5 · DOI
  25. Hammer, 2001, PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis, Palaeontol. Electronica, 9
  26. Han, 1998, Properties of nonwood fibers, Proceedings of the Korea Society of Wood Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 3
  27. Kelly, 2011, Distinct responses in ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria after addition of biosolids to an agricultural soil, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 77, 6551, 10.1128/AEM.02608-10 · DOI
  28. Knauff, 2003, Arylsufatase activity in the rhizosphere and roots of different crop species, Eur. J. Agron., 19, 215, 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00035-7 · DOI
  29. Knorr, 2005, Nitrogen additions and litter decomposition: a meta-analysis, Ecology, 86, 3252, 10.1890/05-0150 · DOI
  30. Kowalchuk, 2002, Effects of above-ground plant species composition and diversity on the diversity of soil-borne microorganisms, A. van Leeuw. J. Microb., 81, 509, 10.1023/A:1020565523615 · DOI
  31. Kramer, 2013, Temporal variation in surface and subsoil abundance and function of the soil microbial community in an arable soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 61, 76, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.006 · DOI
  32. Leita, 1999, Influence of inorganic and organic fertilization on soil microbial biomass, metabolic quotient and heavy metal bioavailability, Biol Fert. Soils, 28, 371, 10.1007/s003740050506 · DOI
  33. Martin, 2005, Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts, BMC Microbiol., 5, 28, 10.1186/1471-2180-5-28 · DOI
  34. Mitchell, 1994, Unique oligonucleotide primers in PCR for identification of Cryptococcus neoformans, J. Clin. Microbiol., 32, 253, 10.1128/jcm.32.1.253-255.1994 · DOI
  35. Mobley, 1989, Microbial ureases: significance regulation, and molecular characterization, Microbiol. Rev., 53, 85, 10.1128/mr.53.1.85-108.1989 · DOI
  36. Müller, 2004, Leucine arylamidase activity in the phyllosphere and the litter layer of a Scots pine forest, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 47, 153, 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00258-7 · DOI
  37. Orwin, 2006, Ecological consequences of carbon substrate identity and diversity in a laboratory study, Ecology, 87, 580, 10.1890/05-0383 · DOI
  38. Øvreås, 1997, Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet: as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 3367, 10.1128/aem.63.9.3367-3373.1997 · DOI
  39. Parham, 2000, Detection: quantification and characterization of b-glucosaminidase activity in soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 1183, 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00034-1 · DOI
  40. Peacock, 2001, Soil microbial community responses to dairy manure or ammonium nitrate applications, Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 1011, 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00004-9 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Ramette, 2007, Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 62, 142, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00375.x · DOI
  42. Reardon, 2014, Diazotroph community structure and abundance in wheat–fallow and wheat–pea crop rotations, Soil Biol. Biochem., 69, 406, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.038 · DOI
  43. Romaní, 2006, Interactions of bacteria and fungi on decomposing litter: differential extracellular enzyme activities, Ecology, 87, 2559, 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2559:IOBAFO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  44. Rousk, 2010, Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil, ISME J., 4, 1340, 10.1038/ismej.2010.58 · DOI
  45. Saison, 2006, Alteration and resilience of the soil microbial community following compost amendment: effects of compost level and compost-borne microbial community, Environ. Microbiol., 8, 247, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00892.x · DOI
  46. Scherer, 2009, Sulfur in soils, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 172, 326, 10.1002/jpln.200900037 · DOI
  47. Six, 2006, Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 555, 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Speir, 1980, A comparison of sulphatase: urease and protease activities in planted and in fallow soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 12, 281, 10.1016/0038-0717(80)90075-9 · DOI
  49. Speir, 2004, Composted biosolids enhance fertility of a sandy loam soil under dairy pasture, Biol Fert. Soils, 40, 349, 10.1007/s00374-004-0787-6 · DOI
  50. Sullivan, 2006, Parallel shifts in plant and soil microbial communities in response to biosolids in a semi-arid grassland, Soil Biol. Biochem., 38, 449, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.018 · DOI
  51. Suto, 2001, Induction and catabolite repression mechanisms of cellulase in fungi, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 92, 305, 10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80231-0 · DOI
  52. Taylor, 2002, Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques, Soil Biol. Biochem., 34, 387, 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00199-7 · DOI
  53. van den Brink, 2011, Fungal enzyme sets for plant polysaccharide degradation, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 91, 1477, 10.1007/s00253-011-3473-2 · DOI
  54. Vilgalys, 1990, Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species, J. Bacteriol., 172, 4238, 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 · DOI
  55. Wuest, 2013, Soil organic carbon and nitrogen after application of nine organic amendments, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, 237, 10.2136/sssaj2012.0184 · DOI
  56. Wuest, 2016, Surface and root inputs produce different carbon to phosphorus ratios in soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 10.2136/sssaj2015.09.0334 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reardon, C. L., & Wuest, S. B.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Reardon, Catherine L.
ORCID
Venue
Applied Soil Ecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
101
Pages
107-116
ISSN
0929-1393 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.013
OpenAlex
W2302529752
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Applied Soil Ecology (acceptedVersion)
Funders
USDA-ARS (216, 212)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
soil amendment, soil microbial communities, long-term effects, carbon amendments, soil enzyme activity, soil organic matter decomposition, wheat, fallow, cotton linter, sawdust, manure, biosolids, compost, fungal abundance, fungal community structure, bacterial community structure, soil carbon cycling, soil nitrogen cycling, soil phosphorus cycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review