Stress response in terrestrial isopods: A comparative study on glycaemia
Open accessAbstract
Stressors are omnipresent in the environment and trigger specific physiological and/or behavioural responses that remain relatively less known in invertebrates. Among the parameters used to quantify the impact of stress on physiology, the circulating level of glucose is commonly used in aquatic crustacean species. Terrestrial isopods are small crustaceans commonly used as bioindicators of soil quality; however, their response to environmental stressors remains poorly documented. In laboratory conditions, we investigated how different stressors influence the physiological response of two terrestrial isopod species. Thus, we exposed Armadillidium vulgare and Porcellio dilatatus to a series of both acute (physical) and chronic (temperature, social isolation, and exposure to herbicide) stressors that mimic potentially stressful situations encountered in their environment. Our results revealed that, for both species, glycaemia is not impacted by thermic shock (1 h at 4 °C), mechanical disturbances (1 min of shaking or upside-down motion) or social isolation (4 weeks) at the population level. Nevertheless, we observed a significantly higher sensitivity in male P. dilatatus exposed to upside-down movements and in males of both species exposed to social isolation. Acute (96 h) and chronic (21 days) exposure to glyphosate (1.8–2.5 kg.ha⁻¹) did not impact glycaemia levels in A. vulgare. However, at both tested doses, individuals exposed to glyphosate for 25 days and subjected to an additional stressor (haemolymph sampling at 96 h) had significantly higher glycaemia in comparison to their control. Survival was also impacted by the joint application of chronic glyphosate exposure and intermediate haemolymph sampling. We conclude that glucose is a potentially good indicator to study the stress response of terrestrial isopods. Additional studies for this parameter, combined with other physiological indicators, are needed to better characterize this response.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Roques, J. A. C., Houdelet, C., & Richard, F.-J.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Roques, Jonathan A.C.
- Venue
- Applied Soil Ecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 103708
- ISSN
- 0929-1393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3039629196
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Soil Ecology (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- terrestrial isopods, stress response, glycemia, glucose, Armadillidium vulgare, Porcellio dilatatus, glyphosate, herbicide exposure, social isolation, temperature stress, mechanical perturbation, survival, bioindicators, soil quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review