Development and validation of novel SNP markers for the rapid identification of natural hybrids of the 11 closely related pufferfish species (Takifugu spp.) distributed in Japan
Open accessAbstract
Accurate identification of interspecific hybrids is vital for breeding programs in hybridizing taxa, as well as for the use of hybrids in aquaculture and fisheries. The use of species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has become the standard for the molecular identification of hybrids. However, it remains challenging to use these SNPs to identify hybrids involving multiple candidate parental species. Here, we developed and validated SNP markers for the identification of hybrids of the 11 closely related pufferfish species (genus Takifugu) distributed in Japan; these species have different aquacultural characteristics, such as growth rate, physiology, behavior, and toxicity. In total, 1232 species-specific SNPs were identified through double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing. The species had 11 (T. flavipterus) to 295 (T. chrysops) species-specific SNPs. We validated 33 genome-wide species-specific SNPs using TaqMan® genotyping assays for the 11 species and their hybrids, which were identified using amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses. No false negative or positive assignments were observed in 77 and 30 specimens of pure species and F1 hybrids, respectively. This marker combination allows rapid and reliable identification of natural hybrids, which will be useful for pufferfish aquaculture and will enhance our understanding of the natural hybridization between various Takifugu species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Species-specific or custom-designed STR and SNP arrays to identify different breeds are becoming more common.
“For non-human models, species-specific or custom-designed STR and SNP arrays to identify different breeds are becoming more common [62,63,64].”
From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [64]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review
Weiskirchen, R. (2026) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci14010025 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Takahashi, H., Kakioka, R., & Nagano, A. J.
- Affiliations
- National Fisheries University (JP)
- University of the Ryukyus (JP)
- Ryukoku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Takahashi, Hiroshi
- Venue
- Aquaculture Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 101650
- ISSN
- 2352-5134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383505768
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Aquaculture Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JPMH21KA0601)
- National Agriculture and Food Research Organization
- Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (16822337)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20H03012)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- Takifugu, pufferfish, interspecific hybrids, hybrid identification, SNP markers, TaqMan genotyping, natural hybridization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review