Cited by 19Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsAquaculture disease management and microbiota

Impact of temperature and growth hormone on growth physiology of juvenile Atlantic wolffish (Anarhichas lupus)

Árnason, Tómas, Gunnarsson, Ásgeir, Steinarsson, Agnar, Daníelsdóttir, Anna Kristín, Björnsson, Björn Thrandur·2019·Aquaculture

Abstract

The effects of temperature and growth hormone (GH) implantation on growth of juvenile Atlantic wolffish (Anarhichas lupus) were investigated. The year-long study had three sequential experimental phases (EP) termed EP1, EP2 and EP3, lasting for 6, 9 and 37 weeks, respectively. The experimental fish were divided into four groups and reared at different target temperatures (3, 7, 11 and 15 °C) during EP1 and EP2, but at a constant temperature of 7 °C during EP3. At the beginning of EP2, half of the fish from each group was implanted with formulation of recombinant bovine GH (Posilac®), while the other half was sham-implanted with vehicle. The optimal temperature for growth (Topt.G) of early juveniles (geometric mean weight 7.5 g) was determined as 12.1 °C during EP1, while the upper critical temperature (Tc) was concluded to be very close to 15 °C, as fish at that temperature had stunted growth, increased mortality and showed external signs of skeletal deformities. Thus, the species was found to be relatively stenothermic during the early juvenile stages and therefore vulnerable to relatively modest increases in environmental temperature above Topt.G. At 15 °C, GH implantation had no effects on growth rate. This indicates that the high allostatic load at this temperature leaves no scope for increased growth. In contrast, at lower rearing temperatures, the GH implantation had substantial, long-term effects on growth rate and induced remarkably similar relative growth stimulation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.02.025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Árnason, T., Gunnarsson, Á., Steinarsson, A., Daníelsdóttir, A. K., & Björnsson, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Marine and Freshwater Research Institute (IS)
  • Matís (Iceland) (IS)
Venue
Aquaculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
504
Pages
404-413
ISSN
0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912428950
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FORMAS
  • Mistra
  • University of Gothenburg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
Atlantic wolffish, Anarhichas lupus, temperature effects on growth, optimal growth temperature, upper critical temperature, stenothermy, juvenile fish growth, skeletal deformities, recombinant bovine somatotropin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review