Natural, in ovo, vertical transmission of the RNA viruses, Chequa iflavirus and Athtab bunyavirus, but not Cherax reovirus in redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus
Abstract
The first molecular evidence for natural, in ovo, vertical transmission of Chequa iflavirus and Athtab bunyavirus from farmed female redclaw crayfish ( Cherax quadricarinatus ) cultured in northern Queensland, Australia is presented. Cherax reovirus was also examined, but evidence that this is spread via in ovo vertically transmission is very limited. Amongst 57 broodstock-derived pools of fertilized eggs, 38 (66.7%), 34 (59.6%) and 6 (10.5%) were positive for Chequa iflavirus, Athtab bunyavirus and Cherax reovirus respectively with the respective average loads of 6.56 × 10 4 , 2.33 × 10 3 and 1.03 × 10 1 copies/μl of tested samples. Grouping samples by farm origins, all viruses in most farms were statistically similar ( P > 0.05) for viral loads. As two viruses are transovarial transmitted, surface sterilizing practices would be ineffective and the load remains high as is seen in Chequa iflavirus and Athtab bunyavirus, but extremely low on surface-treated eggs as appears with Cherax reovirus. Our evidence, plus the literature, supports the general rule that if the virus is in the gut, most of the vertical transmission is faecal /oral and can be drastically reduced by efficient egg surface sterilization. If the virus is spread in ovo, then RT-qPCR testing coupled with therapeutic methods and selection of resistant crayfish families or detection of viral negative, geographically isolated populations of crayfish is the way forward for the removal of Chequa iflavirus and Athtab bunyavirus.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vertical transmission of 2 virus types has been proved using molecular techniques in the redclaw crayfish cultured in Australia.
“Furthermore, a vertical transmission of 2 virus types has been proved using molecular techniques in the redclaw crayfish cultured in Australia (Jaroenram et al., 2021).”
From Potential lineage transmission within the active microbiota of the eggs and the nauplii of the shrimp <i>Litopenaeus stylirostris</i> : possible influence of the rearing water and more (2021) · cites this paper as Jaroenram et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Jaroenram, W., Owens, L., Hayakijkosol, O., & Elliman, J.
- Affiliations
- James Cook University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Owens, Leigh
- Venue
- Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 534
- Pages
- 736285
- ISSN
- 0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111722932
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- Cherax quadricarinatus, vertical transmission, transovarial transmission, viral load, fecal-oral transmission, crustacean viral disease, RT-qPCR detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review