Cited by 2Muscle Physiology and DisordersChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Epigenética y propensión a la atrofia muscular en la EPOC

Open access
Kemp, Paul, Natanek, Amanda·2017·Archivos de Bronconeumología

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arbres.2016.10.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemp, P., & Natanek, A.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kemp, Paul
Venue
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
364-365
ISSN
0300-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582184604
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Archivos de Bronconeumología (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
epigenetics, muscle atrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
MeSH terms
Humans, Disease Progression, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review