Cited by 71Frailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in AgingPhysical Activity and Health

Effects of a physical training and nutritional intervention program in frail elderly people regarding habitual physical activity level and activities of daily living—A randomized controlled pilot study

Rydwik, Elisabeth, Frändin, Kerstin, Akner, Gunnar·2010·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

The aim of this randomized controlled pilot study is to describe the effects of a physical training and nutritional intervention program on the physical activity level and activities of daily living (ADL) in frail elderly people. Ninety-six community-dwelling frail elderly people (58 women) above the age of 75 were included in the study. The 12-week physical and/or nutritional intervention program was followed by six months of home-based exercises for the training groups, followed up with training diaries. At baseline the subjects were screened for physical activity level, walking habits, and ADL. These measurements were repeated immediately after the intervention at 3 months, and at 2nd follow-up at 9 months. ADL data were also collected 24 months after baseline at 3rd follow-up. The intention-to-treat analyses showed an increase of the habitual physical activity level and walking duration at 1st follow-up for the two training groups compared to the other groups. These increases remained at 2nd follow-up. The nutrition intervention did not show any significant results. No significant effects on ADL were shown however, there were moderate correlations between increases in physical activity level and ADL as well as between the amounts of home-based exercises and ADL for the two training groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2009.12.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven RCTs of low or acceptable quality were found using a four-factorial design with an exercise group and a control group in addition to the two aforementioned intervention groups.

    “Seven RCTs (low/acceptable quality) were found using a four factorial design with an exercise group and a control group in addition to the two aforementioned intervention groups (81)(82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)(88).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 71

Authors
Rydwik, E., Frändin, K., & Akner, G.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Örebro University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Rydwik, Elisabeth
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
283-289
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079292797
Cited by
71
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
frail elderly, exercise training, dietary intervention, physical activity level, activities of daily living, home-based exercise, walking time, community-dwelling older adults, exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Models, Statistical, Frail Elderly, Treatment Outcome, Nutrition Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review