Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 70Infection Control in HealthcareNosocomial Infections in ICUUrinary Tract Infections Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hospital acquired infections (HAI) in the elderly: Comparison with the younger patients

Avci, Meltem, Ozgenc, Onur, Coskuner, Seher Ayten, Olut, Ali Ilgın·2012·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the frequency, type, microbiological characteristics and outcome of HAIs in the elderly (age ≥ 65) and to compare the data with younger patients in a Turkish Training and Research Hospital. From January 2008 to December 2009, the infection control team analyzed HAIs among 60,585 hospitalized patients (20,109 aged ≥ 65 and 40,747 aged between 18 and 64 years) with a total number of 419,017 patient days. A total of 825 HAIs episodes were detected in 607 patients, of which 395 episodes were in 301 elderly patients. The incidence of HAIs per 1000 patient days was 2.49 in the elderly and 1.64 in the younger patients' group (p<0.001). The most common site of infection in the elderly patients was the urinary tract, whereas in non-elderly group this was the lower respiratory tract. The incidence density of urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections, surgical site, skin and soft tissue infections, primary bacteremia, and prosthesis infections were significantly higher in the elderly group (p<0.05). Gram-negative species were the most frequently isolated agents in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of isolated pathogens or antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Overall, the fatality rate was found 16.8%. The elderly patients were more likely to have crude mortality rates (22% vs. 12%; p<0.01). The death was most often related to pneumonia, primary bacteremia or intravascular catheter infections in both groups.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2011.03.014

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Avci, M., Ozgenc, O., Coskuner, S. A., & Olut, A. I.
Affiliations
Izmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
247-250
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002818562
Cited by
69
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
nosocomial infections, elderly patients, age comparison, urinary tract infection, respiratory infections, surgical site infection, bacteremia, prosthesis infection, Gram-negative bacteria, mortality, pneumonia, antibiotic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Turkey, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital acquired infections (HAI) in the elderly: Comparison with the younger patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.archger.2011.03.014
The paper
Avci, M., Ozgenc, O., Coskuner, S. A., & Olut, A. I. (2012). Hospital acquired infections (HAI) in the elderly: Comparison with the younger patients. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2011.03.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.