Cited by 38Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrailty in Older Adults

Body composition, physical performance and muscle quality of active elderly women

Vilaça, Karla Helena Coelho, Carneiro, José Ailton Oliveira, Ferriolli, Eduardo, Lima, Nereida Kilza da Costa, Paula, Francisco José Albuquerque de, Moriguti, Julio Cesar·2014·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Fat gain is one of the major factors aggravating physical disability in the elderly population, which presents an increase in fat mass and a decrease in lean mass compared to the young population. For this reason it is important to assess body composition and the effects of these alterations in obese elderly women. The purpose of this study was to assess body composition, physical performance and muscle quality in active elderly women. Cross-sectional study included 75 elderly women (29 eutrophic and 46 obese) 65-80 years old. Body composition was evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the physical performance was determined by 6-minute walk test (6MWT), handgrip strength (HS) and knee extension strength (KES). Muscle quality was calculated as the ratio between muscle strength and lean mass. Fat free mass, lean mass, fat mass and percent body fat were significantly higher in the obese group (p<0.05). Furthermore, the obese group showed a poorer performance than the eutrophic group in the 6MWT (432.31±66.13 m and 472.07±74.03 m, respectively, p=0.01). HS and KES did not differ between groups, however, regarding muscle quality, the obese group exhibited a impaired in comparison to the eutrophic group in the upper (11.45±2.57 kg and 13.31±2.03 kg, respectively, p<0.01) and lower limb (2.91±1.16 kg and 3.44±0.97 kg, respectively, p=0.05). The increase in muscle mass detected in the obese elderly was not sufficient to maintain adequate muscle quality and physical function, showing a negative influence of the excess of body fat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2014.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 38

Authors
Vilaça, K. H. C., Carneiro, J. A. O., Ferriolli, E., Lima, N. K. D. C., Paula, F. J. A. D., & Moriguti, J. C.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
44-48
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075529307
Cited by
38
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
body composition, physical performance, muscle quality, older women, obesity, fat mass, lean body mass, fat-free mass, grip strength, quadriceps strength, 6-minute walk test, physical function, physical activity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Knee, Obesity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review