Cited by 120Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityHIV/AIDS oral health manifestationsYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Distribution of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species in oral candidiasis patients: correlation between cell surface hydrophobicity and biofilm forming activities

Muadcheingka, Thaniya, Tantivitayakul, Pornpen·2015·Archives of Oral Biology

Abstract

Objectives The purposes of this investigation were to study the prevalence of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida (NAC) species from oral candidiasis patients and evaluate the cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) and biofilm forming capacity of the clinical isolates Candida species from oral cavity.Design This study identified a total of 250 Candida strains isolated from 207 oral candidiasis patients with PCR-RFLP technique. CSH value, total biomass of biofilm and biofilm forming ability of 117 oral Candida isolates were evaluated.Results C. albicans (61.6%) was still the predominant species in oral candidiasis patients with and without denture wearer, respectively, followed by C. glabrata (15.2%), C. tropicalis (10.4%), C. parapsilosis (3.2%), C. kefyr (3.6%), C. dubliniensis (2%), C. lusitaniae (2%), C. krusei (1.6%), and C. guilliermondii (0.4%). The proportion of mixed colonization with more than one Candida species was 18% from total cases. The relative CSH value and biofilm biomass of NAC species were greater than C. albicans (p<0.001). Ninety-two percent of oral isolates NAC species had biofilm forming ability, whereas 78% of C. albicans were biofilm formers. Furthermore, the significant difference of relative CSH values between biofilm formers and non-biofilm formers was observed in the NAC species (p<0.005), whereas the difference was not statistically significant in C. albicans.Conclusion The frequency of the NAC species colonization in oral cavity was gradually increasing. The possible contributing factors might be high cell surface hydrophobicity and biofilm forming ability. The relative CSH value could be a putative factor for determining biofilm formation ability of the non-albicans Candida species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 120

Authors
Muadcheingka, T., & Tantivitayakul, P.
Affiliations
Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
Tantivitayakul, Pornpen
Venue
Archives of Oral Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
894-901
ISSN
0003-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982476880
Cited by
120
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Oral Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, non-albicans Candida, oral candidiasis, cell surface hydrophobicity, biofilm formation, Candida species distribution, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida kefyr, Candida dubliniensis, Candida lusitaniae, Candida krusei, Candida guilliermondii, denture wearers
MeSH terms
Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Oral, Female, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Thailand, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Biofilms, Biomass, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review