Cited by 9Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Prediction of alterations in glucose metabolism by glucose and insulin measurements in early pregnancy

López Caudana, Alma Ethelia, López Ridaura, Ruy, González Villalpando, Clicerio, Lazcano Ponce, Eduardo César, Casanueva y López, Esther Margarita, Hernández Ávila, Mauricio, Téllez-Rojo Solís, Martha María·2011·Archives of Medical Research

Abstract

Background and aims Abnormal dysglycemia during pregnancy increases morbimortality in women and newborns. This study evaluated early markers for that event. We undertook this study to estimate the incidence of dysglycemic events during pregnancy and to evaluate fasting glycemia, insulin and HOMA-IR index in early pregnancy as their predictors in order to compare their predictive capability for gestational diabetes (GD). Methods This was a prospective cohort that included 450 women seeking prenatal care at the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS). Subjects were ≥19 years old, in early pregnancy, without previous dysglycemia or hypertension, and with fasting glycemia <126 mg/dL. Insulin and HOMA-IR were measured. At 24-36 weeks of gestation, a 3-h 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed, applying the modified Carpenter-Coustan criteria. Multiple logistic regression models including an offset term as indicator of time in risk allowed us to estimate the risk of developing glucose intolerance (GI), GD, or hyperglycemia 1-h after the glucose load (HG-1). Areas under the ROC curve allowed comparison of the models' predictive capability. Results Incidence of dysglycemic events was 20.7%. The risk of GD was higher for the highest glycemia (RR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.6-10.6), insulin (RR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-14.2), and HOMA-IR (RR = 6.4, 95% CI 1.9-21.9). A higher risk of GI was found for the highest values of glycemia (RR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.3). Higher glycemia (RR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.6-9.2), insulin (RR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.5) and HOMA-IR (RR = 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-10.2) were associated with HG-1. Areas under the ROC curve for adjusted models with glycemia, insulin, or HOMA-IR were 0.749, 0.715, and 0.747, respectively (p = 0.4). Conclusions Fasting glycemia was the best adjusted predictor of GD in early pregnancy, having equal predictive capability compared to insulin and HOMA-IR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.01.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López Caudana, A. E., López Ridaura, R., González Villalpando, C., Lazcano Ponce, E. C., Casanueva y López, E. M., Hernández Ávila, M., & Téllez-Rojo Solís, M. M.
Venue
Archives of Medical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
70-76
ISSN
  • 0066-6769 (ISSN-L)
  • 0188-4409
OpenAlex
W2142185837
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Medical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Coordination at the IMSS (2005/1/I/090)
  • National Institute of Public Health, and the National Institute of Perinatology in Mexico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, early pregnancy, fasting blood glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperglycemia, dysglycemia, risk prediction, oral glucose tolerance test, Carpenter and Coustan criteria, prenatal care, women of reproductive age, Mexico City, maternal and neonatal morbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Insulin, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Cohort Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review