Cited by 8Genital Health and DiseaseChild Abuse and Related TraumaChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lichen scléro-arophique vulvaire chez l’enfant : diagnostic différentiel d’abus sexuel

Delmarre, E., Delteil, C., Mallet, S., Boval, C., Capasso, F., Piercecchi-Marti, M.-D.·2015·Archives de Pédiatrie

Abstract

Introduction With the frequency of lawsuits for sexual abuse increasing, high-quality care for victims is of utmost importance. Genital examination is difficult to perform, especially on children, but is a key item for diagnosis. A case report is presented herein to illustrate this issue.Case presentation A sexual assault was suspected on 2.5-year-old female twins. Clinical examination primarily detected vulvar micro-hematoma and hypopigmentation, discreetly sclerosing, as well as atrophic labia and a beginning of lichenification on one of them. The other twin showed an unspecific and erythematous lesion. Elimination of the supposedly dangerous environment and a remote consultation brought out a paradoxical development to the story and confirmed the diagnosis of vulvar lichen sclerosus.Discussion Traumatic lesions caused by sexual abuse are uncommon. Coexisting allegations and lesions in the genital area lend support to the hypothesis of sexual abuse. However, genital-anal tropism dermatosis can mimic traumatic injuries. Lichen sclerosus is an example of a differential diagnosis of vulvar traumatic lesions, which is quite often unknown to physicians, including pediatricians. This case report shows that taking the appropriate time in multidisciplinary councils can suggest a differential diagnosis. Nonetheless, it should be remembered that identifying the pathology behind the lesions cannot allow the physician to negate the child's story about potentially sexual acts, although the truth of this story and the perpetrator must still be proven by a court of law.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.12.016

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dehen, 2001, Lichen scléreux vulvaire chez la petite fille, Ann Dermatol Venereol, 128, 689

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Delmarre, E., Delteil, C., Mallet, S., Boval, C., Capasso, F., & Piercecchi-Marti, M.-D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
Corresponding author
Delmarre, E.
Venue
Archives de Pédiatrie
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
383-386
ISSN
0929-693X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2273466152
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives de Pédiatrie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
lichen sclerosus, child sexual abuse, differential diagnosis, genital dermatoses, twins, child protection, multidisciplinary care, sexual assault allegations, lichenification, vulvar atrophy
MeSH terms
Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review