Cited by 174Nutrition and Health in AgingGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Effectiveness of mealtime interventions on nutritional outcomes for the elderly living in residential care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Abbott, Rebecca A., Whear, Rebecca, Thompson-Coon, Jo, Ukoumunne, Obioha C., Rogers, Morwenna, Bethel, Alison, Hemsley, Anthony, Stein, Ken·2013·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

The need to improve the nutrition of the elderly living in long term care has long been recognised, but how this can best be achieved, and whether (and which) intervention is successful in reducing morbidity is less well understood. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of mealtime interventions for the elderly living in residential care. Mealtime interventions were considered as those that aimed to change/improve the mealtime routine, practice, experience or environment. Following comprehensive searches, review and appraisal, 37 articles were included. Inadequate reporting in over half of the articles limited data quality appraisal. Mealtime interventions were categorised into five types: changes to food service, food improvement, dining environment alteration, staff training and feeding assistance. Meta-analysis found inconsistent evidence of effects on body weight of changes to food service (0.5 kg; 95% CI: -1.1 to 2.2; p=0.51), food improvement interventions (0.4 kg; 95% CI: -0.8 to 1.7; p=0.50) or alterations to dining environment (1.5 kg; 95% CI: -0.7 to 2.8; p=0.23). Findings from observational studies within these intervention types were mixed, but generally positive. Observational studies also found positive effects on food/caloric intake across all intervention types, though meta-analyses of randomised studies showed little evidence of any effects on food/caloric intake in food improvement studies (-5 kcal; 95% CI: -36 to 26; p=0.74).…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2013.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three relevant systematic literature reviews of high or average quality were identified, examining training for staff in residential care, people with dementia and/or their formal or informal care-givers, and informal carers and community care workers.

    “Three relevant systematic literature reviews (SLRs) of high (63,64) or average quality (65) were identified, which examined the effectiveness of training for staff in residential care (64), people with dementia and/or their formal or informal care-givers (63) and informal carers and community care workers (65).”
  • Abbott et al. included six feeding assistance studies; two RCTs and three pre-post comparisons described positive effects on dietary intake.

    “Abbott et al. (64) included six feeding assistance studies.Two RCTs and three pre-post comparisons described positive effects on dietary intake.”
  • Quality of life was examined in two studies which both found beneficial effects of dining environment alteration.

    “Quality of life was examined in two studies which both found beneficial effects.”
  • Meta-analysis results were in favor of dining environment alteration regarding body weight (all three RCTs) and energy intake (two RCTs) but were not significant.

    “Meta-analysis results were in favor of the intervention regarding BW (all three RCTs) and energy intake (two RCTs) but not J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f significant.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 174

Authors
Abbott, R. A., Whear, R., Thompson-Coon, J., Ukoumunne, O. C., Rogers, M., Bethel, A., Hemsley, A., & Stein, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
967-981
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079123427
Cited by
174
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
older adults, residential care, long-term care, nutritional outcomes, body weight, food service, eating environment, employee training, feeding assistance, dietary intake, energy intake
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Eating, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Nutritional Status, Residential Facilities, Treatment Outcome, Nurse's Role, Early Medical Intervention, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review