Cited by 26Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Cholinesterase inhibitors and add-on nutritional supplements in Alzheimer's disease

Rijpma, A., Meulenbroek, O., Olde Rikkert, M.G.M.·2014·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

To date, single drug and nutrient-based interventions have failed to show a clinically relevant effect on Alzheimer's disease (AD). Multidomain interventions may alleviate symptoms and alter the disease course in a synergistic manner. This systematic review examines the effect of adding nutritional supplementation to cholinesterase inhibitors. A systematic PubMed and Cochrane search resulted in nine high quality studies. The studies had low to moderate risk of bias and focused on oxidative stress, homocysteine levels, membrane fluidity, inflammation and acetylcholine levels. Only the use of vitamin E supplements could reduce the rate of functional decline when combined with cholinesterase inhibitors in one study, whereas cognition was not affected in both this and other studies. None of the other nutritional supplements showed convincing evidence of a beneficial effect when combined with cholinesterase inhibitors. This shows that cognitive and functional improvement is difficult to achieve in patients with AD, despite epidemiological data and evidence of biological effects of nutritional supplements. Addressing one disease pathway in addition to cholinesterase inhibitor therapy is probably insufficient to alter the course of the disease. Personalized, multifactorial interventions may be more successful in improving cognition and daily functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2014.06.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rijpma, A., Meulenbroek, O., & Olde Rikkert, M. G. M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Rijpma, A.
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
16
Pages
105-112
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120640926
Cited by
26
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cholinesterase inhibitors, dietary supplements, vitamin E, oxidative stress, homocysteine, membrane fluidity, inflammation, acetylcholine, functional decline, cognition, multidomain intervention, personalized interventions
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review