Modifiable lifestyle factors and cognitive reserve: a systematic review of current evidence
Open accessAbstract
This systematic review aims to summarize cognitive reserve (CR) evaluation approaches and to examine the role of seven selected modifiable lifestyle factors (diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, cognitive leisure activity, sleep, and meditation) in mitigating the impacts of age- or disease-related brain changes on cognition. Eighteen population-based English empirical studies were included. We summarize the study designs and identify three CR models that were broadly used in these studies, including a residual model assessing lifestyle factors in relation to unexplained variance in cognition after accounting for brain markers, a moderation model testing whether lifestyle factors moderate the relationship between brain status and cognition, and a controlling model examining the associations between lifestyle factors and cognition when controlling for brain measures. We also present the findings for the impact of each lifestyle factor. No studies examined diet, sleep, or meditation, and only two studies focused on smoking and alcohol consumption each. Overall, the studies suggest lifestyle activity factors (physical and cognitive leisure activities) may contribute to CR and attenuate the damaging impact of brain changes on cognition. Standardized measurements of lifestyle factors and CR are needed, and mechanisms underlying CR need to be further addressed as well.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A systematic review found that physical, cognitive and social activities increase cognitive reserve and attenuate the effect of neuropathology.
“A systematic review found that physical, cognitive and social activities increase cognitive reserve and attenuate the effect of neuropathology. (23)”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
The Results (Overview of studies; page unavailable) report that greater physical and cognitive leisure activity attenuated the association between certain brain markers and cognition, but also report nonsignificant findings. The Conclusion (page unavailable) says lifestyle activities may mitigate these associations, not that they definitively increase cognitive reserve. The passages do not establish the same effect for social activity independently, so the citing sentence overstates the review’s findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 105 · Cited by 248
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Conde-Sala JL, Garre-Olmo J, Vilalta-Franch J,, 2013. Cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. A follow three or more years of a sample of patients. Rev Neurol. 56(12), 593– 600. 23744245
- Reserve and Resilience Workshop. Framework for Terms Used in Research of Reserve and Resilience. https://reserveandresilience.com/framework/. Accessed June 22, 2021.
- Scarmeas N, 2007. Lifestyle patterns and cognitive reserve, in: Stern Y (Ed.), Cognitive reserve: Theory and applications. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 187– 206.
- World Health Organization, 2019. Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/risk-reduction-of-cognitive-decline-and-dementia Accessed June 22, 2021. 31219687
- Authors
- Song, S., Stern, Y., & Gu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gu, Yian
- Venue
- Ageing Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 101551
- ISSN
- 1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8794051
- OpenAlex
- W4200219305
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 16
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG026158, AG061008, AG061421)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- cognitive reserve, modifiable lifestyle factors, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, sleep, meditation, brain changes, cognitive aging, residual model, moderation model, control model
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Humans, Life Style, Exercise, Cognitive Reserve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review