Cited by 25Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchChronic Disease Management StrategiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

How to manage comorbidities in people with dementia: A scoping review

Ma, Dongfei, Wang, Yonghong, Zhao, Yanjie, Meng, Xiangfei, Su, Jianping, Zhi, Shengze, Song, Dongpo, Gao, Shizheng +2 more·2023·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Background People with dementia experience a high prevalence of comorbidities that seriously affect patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to map the evidence and components related to comorbidity management, including interventions to facilitate and support the practice of management.Methods A scoping review was conducted. In June 2022, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Open grey, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant literature. The inclusion criteria were outlined to identify studies on comorbidity management in people with dementia.Results We found 43 items that met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were published since 2010. Most research focused on medication management, health care service use and provision, and comorbidity-related monitoring and management; there were a small number of studies that involved decision-making. Only 6 studies developed interventions to support dementia care, which included comorbidity management. Studies involving the comorbidity management process were mainly based on qualitative methods, which make it difficult to quantify the impact of these processes on comorbidity management.Conclusions Given the serious impact of dementia on managing comorbidities, there is a need to develop systematic interventions targeting the management of comorbidities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101937

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current guidelines and literature inadequately address the complexity of managing MLTCiD, with a tendency for a single-disease focus; only one of 13 NICE guidance documents acknowledged the impact of dementia on care management.

    “Current guidelines and literature inadequately addresses the complexity of managing MLTCiD with a tendency for a single-disease focus (i.e., only one of 13 NICE guidance documents acknowledged the impact of dementia on care management [20]) [21–24].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 25

Authors
Ma, D., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Meng, X., Su, J., Zhi, S., Song, D., Gao, S., Sun, J., & Sun, J.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Xinjiang Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Juanjuan
  • Sun, Jiao
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
88
Pages
101937
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366483617
Cited by
25
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
dementia, comorbidity management, medication management, health care utilization, decision-making, older adults
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review