New era of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based detection, diagnosis, and therapeutics in Parkinson’s disease
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by the loss of neuronal cells, which leads to synaptic dysfunction and cognitive defects. Despite the advancements in treatment strategies, the management of PD is still a challenging event. Early prediction and diagnosis of PD are of utmost importance for effective management of PD. In addition, the classification of patients with PD as compared to normal healthy individuals also imposes drawbacks in the early diagnosis of PD. To address these challenges, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models have been implicated in the diagnosis, prediction, and treatment of PD. Recent times have also demonstrated the implication of AI and ML models in the classification of PD based on neuroimaging methods, speech recording, gait abnormalities, and others. Herein, we have briefly discussed the role of AI and ML in the diagnosis, treatment, and identification of novel biomarkers in the progression of PD. We have also highlighted the role of AI and ML in PD management through altered lipidomics and gut-brain axis. We briefly explain the role of early PD detection through AI and ML algorithms based on speech recordings, handwriting patterns, gait abnormalities, and neuroimaging techniques. Further, the review discuss the potential role of the metaverse, the Internet of Things, and electronic health records in the effective management of PD to improve the quality of life. Lastly, we also focused on the implementation of AI and ML-algorithms in neurosurgical process and drug discovery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML algorithms offer enhanced predictive performance over traditional rule-based methods in disease risk prediction.
“Our results align with a growing body of literature indicating that ML algorithms offer enhanced predictive performance over traditional rule-based methods in disease risk prediction [31–34].”
From Machine learning with the body roundness index and associated indicators: a new approach to predicting metabolic syndrome (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 252 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Gupta, R., Kumari, S., Senapati, A., Ambasta, R. K., & Kumar, P.
- Affiliations
- Delhi Technological University (IN)
- Acton-Boxborough Regional High School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gupta, Rohan
- Kumar, Pravir
- Venue
- Ageing Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 102013
- ISSN
- 1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383645869
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 252
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
- Delhi Technological University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, artificial intelligence, machine learning, early diagnosis, disease progression prediction, biomarkers, neuroimaging, speech analysis, gait analysis, handwriting analysis, lipidomics, gut-brain axis, metaverse, Internet of Things, electronic health records, neurosurgery, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Quality of Life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review